Coco Gauff vs Amanda Anisimova — Parma Quarter-final

Parma · WTA · Quarter-final
Coco Gauff
USA3
Coco Gauff
#4WTA
2071ELO
2018Clay ELO
$2.9MYTD
$33MCAREER
22 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 May 2021
clay
Amanda Anisimova
USA5
Amanda Anisimova
#9WTA
1914ELO
1751Clay ELO
$1.2MYTD
$14MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLW
Gauff C.
6-3 6-3
Anisimova A.
Gauff C.
662
Anisimova A.
330

Coco Gauff defeated Amanda Anisimova 6-3 6-3 in the Parma quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Coco Gauff came in ranked #4. Coco Gauff claimed a first win over Amanda Anisimova in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-09-24BeijingSFhardAmanda Anisimova6-1 6-2
2022-06-27WimbledonR32grassAmanda Anisimova6-7(4) 6-2 6-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Gauff C.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Anisimova A.

Anisimova A.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Gauff C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gauff C.Anisimova A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
48%
45%
Break points saved·Even
56%
56%
Aces / match·Even
3.4
3.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.8
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gauff C.Anisimova A.
Clutch Rating·Even
99
96
Break points saved·Even
96
95
Break points won·Even
100
99
Deciding sets·Slight edge
100
95
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
99
94

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gauff C.Anisimova A.
Freshness·Clear edge
70
90

Gauff C.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d) · Anisimova A.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Gauff C.[3]
Wang Q.[6]
6-16-3
Semi-finals
Gauff C.[3]
Siniakova K.
7-51-66-2
Wang Q.[6]
Stephens S.
6-27-63
Quarter-finals
Siniakova K.
Garcia C.[8]
7-56-1
Stephens S.
Errani S.
6-36-0
Gauff C.[3]
Anisimova A.[5]
6-36-3
Wang Q.[6]
Martic P.[2]
7-643-67-5
R16
Anisimova A.[5]
Schmiedlova A.
6-26-4
Siniakova K.
Williams S.[1]
7-646-2
Errani S.
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
4-67-52-2
Stephens S.
Kasatkina D.[4]
1-66-47-5
Garcia C.[8]
Friedsam A.
6-26-4
Gauff C.[3]
Giorgi C.
6-26-3
Martic P.[2]
Samsonova L.
7-656-3
Wang Q.[6]
Di Giuseppe M.
6-46-4
R32
Gauff C.[3]
Kanepi K.
7-667-67
Schmiedlova A.
Williams V.
5-76-26-2
Samsonova L.
Gatto Monticone G.
6-26-2
Wang Q.[6]
Doi M.
6-25-76-1
Di Giuseppe M.
Hibino N.
7-57-65
Williams S.[1]
Pigato L.
6-36-2
Siniakova K.
Tauson C.
6-16-3
Friedsam A.
Golubic V.
6-46-716-2
Garcia C.[8]
Ormaechea P.
6-46-4
Giorgi C.
Mchale C.
6-746-46-4
Anisimova A.[5]
Paolini J.
6-26-1
Sorribes Tormo S.[7]
Pera B.
6-46-2
Errani S.
Bogdan A.
7-54-66-1
Stephens S.
Mcnally C.
7-646-4
Martic P.[2]
Gracheva V.
6-46-2
Kasatkina D.[4]
Hsieh S.
6-46-3