Anastasija Sevastova vs Jil Teichmann — Rome Round of 64
Rome · WTA · Round of 64
#286WTA
1719ELO
1695Clay ELO
36 yrs · 169 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 May 2021
clay
#124WTA
1687ELO
1653Clay ELO
28 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Sevastova A.3-6 6-1 6-3
Teichmann J.
Sevastova A.
3662
Teichmann J.
6131
Anastasija Sevastova defeated Jil Teichmann 3-6 6-1 6-3 in the Rome round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Jil Teichmann came in ranked #124, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 64. Anastasija Sevastova claimed a first win over Jil Teichmann in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.
Key context
- Match story: Anastasija Sevastova dropped the opening set before beating Jil Teichmann 3–6 6–1 6–3.
Head to head
0–1| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-22 | Adelaide | QF | hard | Jil Teichmann | 6-4 6-7(8) 7-5 |
Serve vs return
This seasonBaseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
47%
Service points won·Even
57%
57%
Return points won·Even
44%
44%
Break points saved·Even
55%
54%
Aces / match·Even
2.1
2.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.3
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (83 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
66
50
Break points saved·Even
73
71
Break points won·Slight edge
89
84
Deciding sets·Dominant
74
32
Tiebreaks·Dominant
64
90
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
25°CClear
Wind 16 km/hHumidity 42%
Draw
Quarter-finals
Gauff C.
Barty A.[1]
4-61-2
Martic P.
Pegula J.
7-56-4
Swiatek I.[15]
Svitolina E.[5]
6-27-5
Pliskova K.[9]
Ostapenko J.
4-67-57-61
R16
Gauff C.
Sabalenka A.[7]
7-56-3
Pliskova K.[9]
Zvonareva V.
7-56-3
Pegula J.
Alexandrova E.
6-26-4
Martic P.
Podoroska N.
3-66-16-2
Ostapenko J.
Kerber A.
4-66-36-4
Swiatek I.[15]
Krejcikova B.
3-67-657-5
Svitolina E.[5]
Muguruza G.[12]
6-46-2
Barty A.[1]
Kudermetova V.
6-36-3
R32
Alexandrova E.
Brady J.[13]
W/O
Barty A.[1]
Shvedova Y.
6-46-1
Kudermetova V.
Garcia C.
6-46-4
Kerber A.
Halep S.[3]
1-63-3
Pliskova K.[9]
Sevastova A.
6-26-3
Martic P.
Mladenovic K.
7-56-3
Gauff C.
Sakkari M.[17]
6-11-66-1
Krejcikova B.
Kenin S.[4]
6-16-4
Muguruza G.[12]
Pera B.
2-66-07-5
Svitolina E.[5]
Anisimova A.
2-66-36-4
Pegula J.
Osaka N.[2]
7-626-2
Zvonareva V.
Kvitova P.[11]
6-43-66-4
Sabalenka A.[7]
Sorribes Tormo S.
7-56-1
Swiatek I.[15]
Keys M.
7-56-1
Ostapenko J.
Tomljanovic A.
6-27-63
Podoroska N.
Williams S.[8]
7-667-5
R64
Garcia C.
Cocciaretto E.
7-686-2
Sorribes Tormo S.
Giorgi C.
7-646-777-5
Swiatek I.[15]
Riske Amritraj A.
5-4
Pera B.
Zidansek T.
6-36-2
Alexandrova E.
Kostyuk M.
6-36-1
Shvedova Y.
Trevisan M.
0-67-647-66
Krejcikova B.
Zheng S.
6-26-0
Podoroska N.
Siegemund L.
2-67-636-1
Martic P.
Rogers S.
5-76-36-4
Pegula J.
Kasatkina D.
7-56-3
Ostapenko J.
Konta J.[16]
6-36-1
Sakkari M.[17]
Hercog P.
7-663-66-2
Muguruza G.[12]
Tig P.
6-16-2
Zvonareva V.
Mchale C.
6-36-0
Kvitova P.[11]
Linette M.
1-66-06-2
Tomljanovic A.
Vondrousova M.
6-46-2
Kerber A.
Cornet A.
6-27-5
Kudermetova V.
Mertens E.[14]
4-66-26-3
Gauff C.
Putintseva Y.
7-54-66-4
Keys M.
Stephens S.
4-66-27-5
Anisimova A.
Wang Q.
7-56-3
Sevastova A.
Teichmann J.
3-66-16-3
Mladenovic K.
Bencic B.[10]
6-36-4
Brady J.[13]
Zhang S.
6-16-4