Coco Gauff vs Ashleigh Barty — Rome Quarter-final

Rome · WTA · Quarter-final
Coco Gauff
USA
Coco Gauff
#7WTA
2071ELO
2018Clay ELO
$2.9MYTD
$33MCAREER
22 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLWW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 10 May 2021
clay
AUS1
Ashleigh Barty
30 yrs · 166 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
Gauff C.
4-6 1-2
Barty A.
Gauff C.
41–
Barty A.
62–

Coco Gauff advanced when Ashleigh Barty retired 4-6 1-2 in the Rome quarter-final. Coco Gauff claimed a first win over Ashleigh Barty in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-01-03Adelaide 1R16hardAshleigh Barty4-6 7-5 6-1
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Gauff C.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Barty A.

Barty A.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Gauff C.

Serve advantage — Barty A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gauff C.Barty A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
76%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
44%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
65%
Return points won·Even
48%
46%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.4
6.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.8
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 59). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gauff C.Barty A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
99
90
Break points saved·Even
96
94
Break points won·Slight edge
100
92
Deciding sets·Even
100
99
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
99
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gauff C.Barty A.
Freshness·
60
—

Gauff C.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 85 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
25°CClear
Wind 16 km/hHumidity 42%

Draw

Final
Swiatek I.[15]
Pliskova K.[9]
6-06-0
Semi-finals
Swiatek I.[15]
Gauff C.
7-636-3
Pliskova K.[9]
Martic P.
6-13-66-2
Quarter-finals
Gauff C.
Barty A.[1]
4-61-2
Martic P.
Pegula J.
7-56-4
Swiatek I.[15]
Svitolina E.[5]
6-27-5
Pliskova K.[9]
Ostapenko J.
4-67-57-61
R16
Gauff C.
Sabalenka A.[7]
7-56-3
Pliskova K.[9]
Zvonareva V.
7-56-3
Pegula J.
Alexandrova E.
6-26-4
Martic P.
Podoroska N.
3-66-16-2
Ostapenko J.
Kerber A.
4-66-36-4
Swiatek I.[15]
Krejcikova B.
3-67-657-5
Svitolina E.[5]
Muguruza G.[12]
6-46-2
Barty A.[1]
Kudermetova V.
6-36-3
R32
Alexandrova E.
Brady J.[13]
W/O
Barty A.[1]
Shvedova Y.
6-46-1
Kudermetova V.
Garcia C.
6-46-4
Kerber A.
Halep S.[3]
1-63-3
Pliskova K.[9]
Sevastova A.
6-26-3
Martic P.
Mladenovic K.
7-56-3
Gauff C.
Sakkari M.[17]
6-11-66-1
Krejcikova B.
Kenin S.[4]
6-16-4
Muguruza G.[12]
Pera B.
2-66-07-5
Svitolina E.[5]
Anisimova A.
2-66-36-4
Pegula J.
Osaka N.[2]
7-626-2
Zvonareva V.
Kvitova P.[11]
6-43-66-4
Sabalenka A.[7]
Sorribes Tormo S.
7-56-1
Swiatek I.[15]
Keys M.
7-56-1
Ostapenko J.
Tomljanovic A.
6-27-63
Podoroska N.
Williams S.[8]
7-667-5
R64
Garcia C.
Cocciaretto E.
7-686-2
Sorribes Tormo S.
Giorgi C.
7-646-777-5
Swiatek I.[15]
Riske Amritraj A.
5-4
Pera B.
Zidansek T.
6-36-2
Alexandrova E.
Kostyuk M.
6-36-1
Shvedova Y.
Trevisan M.
0-67-647-66
Krejcikova B.
Zheng S.
6-26-0
Podoroska N.
Siegemund L.
2-67-636-1
Martic P.
Rogers S.
5-76-36-4
Pegula J.
Kasatkina D.
7-56-3
Ostapenko J.
Konta J.[16]
6-36-1
Sakkari M.[17]
Hercog P.
7-663-66-2
Muguruza G.[12]
Tig P.
6-16-2
Zvonareva V.
Mchale C.
6-36-0
Kvitova P.[11]
Linette M.
1-66-06-2
Tomljanovic A.
Vondrousova M.
6-46-2
Kerber A.
Cornet A.
6-27-5
Kudermetova V.
Mertens E.[14]
4-66-26-3
Gauff C.
Putintseva Y.
7-54-66-4
Keys M.
Stephens S.
4-66-27-5
Anisimova A.
Wang Q.
7-56-3
Sevastova A.
Teichmann J.
3-66-16-3
Mladenovic K.
Bencic B.[10]
6-36-4
Brady J.[13]
Zhang S.
6-16-4