Vit Kopriva vs Yannick Maden — Prague 1 CH Round of 16

Prague 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Vit Kopriva
CZE
Vit Kopriva
#64ATP
1740ELO
1699Clay ELO
$805kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 May 2021
clay
GER
Yannick Maden
36 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLW
Kopriva V.
4-6 6-4 6-1
Maden Y.
Kopriva V.
4662
Maden Y.
6411

Vit Kopriva defeated Yannick Maden 4-6 6-4 6-1 in the Prague 1 CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kopriva V.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Maden Y.

Maden Y.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Kopriva V.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Kopriva V.Maden Y.
20
Serve
—
56
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Kopriva V.Maden Y.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
57%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
1.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 34). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kopriva V.Maden Y.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
72
30
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
70
Break points won·Dominant
66
39
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
20
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
61
54

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kopriva V.Maden Y.
Freshness·
97
—

Kopriva V.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.
Otte O.
5-76-46-4
Semi-finals
Otte O.
Vrbensky M.
6-36-3
Griekspoor T.
Gombos N.[1]
7-656-3
Quarter-finals
Otte O.
Cressy M.
6-37-5
Vrbensky M.
Kopriva V.
6-16-4
Griekspoor T.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-26-4
Gombos N.[1]
Nagal S.[8]
6-46-2
R16
Cressy M.
Tabilo A.
6-27-5
Otte O.
Lehecka J.
6-13-66-3
Vrbensky M.
Martin A.[3]
6-41-66-4
Kopriva V.
Maden Y.
4-66-46-1
Ferreira Silva F.
Polmans M.
6-23-66-4
Griekspoor T.
Olivo R.
6-37-63
Nagal S.[8]
Stakhovsky S.
4-66-16-4
Gombos N.[1]
Zuk K.
6-36-716-3
R32
Otte O.
Gojowczyk P.[7]
6-36-1
Cressy M.
Safwat M.
6-26-2
Lehecka J.
Safiullin R.
4-66-37-64
Vrbensky M.
Ofner S.
7-646-3
Kopriva V.
Marchenko I.
6-26-747-66
Maden Y.
Kudla D.[5]
6-16-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Majchrzak K.[6]
6-46-756-1
Polmans M.
Marcora R.
7-646-2
Griekspoor T.
Rosol L.
6-36-0
Olivo R.
Novak D.[4]
6-47-61
Nagal S.[8]
Kolar Z.
6-26-4
Stakhovsky S.
Popko D.
6-36-4
Zuk K.
Vilella Martinez M.
7-652-67-5
Gombos N.[1]
Laaksonen H.
6-766-46-3
Martin A.[3]
Paulson A.
6-36-3
Tabilo A.
Sugita Y.[2]
7-54-0