Sumit Nagal vs Zdenek Kolar — Prague 1 CH Round of 32

Prague 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Sumit Nagal
IND8
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 May 2021
clay
Zdenek Kolar
CZE
Zdenek Kolar
#153ATP
1506ELO
1485Clay ELO
$121kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLLW
Nagal S.
6-2 6-4
Kolar Z.
Nagal S.
662
Kolar Z.
240

Sumit Nagal defeated Zdenek Kolar 6-2 6-4 in the Prague 1 CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Kolar Z.

Kolar Z.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Kolar Z.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
42%
41%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.5
2.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Kolar Z.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
33
26
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
53
Break points won·Slight edge
35
28
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
58
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Kolar Z.
Freshness·Slight edge
96
90

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Kolar Z.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.
Otte O.
5-76-46-4
Semi-finals
Otte O.
Vrbensky M.
6-36-3
Griekspoor T.
Gombos N.[1]
7-656-3
Quarter-finals
Otte O.
Cressy M.
6-37-5
Vrbensky M.
Kopriva V.
6-16-4
Griekspoor T.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-26-4
Gombos N.[1]
Nagal S.[8]
6-46-2
R16
Cressy M.
Tabilo A.
6-27-5
Otte O.
Lehecka J.
6-13-66-3
Vrbensky M.
Martin A.[3]
6-41-66-4
Kopriva V.
Maden Y.
4-66-46-1
Ferreira Silva F.
Polmans M.
6-23-66-4
Griekspoor T.
Olivo R.
6-37-63
Nagal S.[8]
Stakhovsky S.
4-66-16-4
Gombos N.[1]
Zuk K.
6-36-716-3
R32
Otte O.
Gojowczyk P.[7]
6-36-1
Cressy M.
Safwat M.
6-26-2
Lehecka J.
Safiullin R.
4-66-37-64
Vrbensky M.
Ofner S.
7-646-3
Kopriva V.
Marchenko I.
6-26-747-66
Maden Y.
Kudla D.[5]
6-16-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Majchrzak K.[6]
6-46-756-1
Polmans M.
Marcora R.
7-646-2
Griekspoor T.
Rosol L.
6-36-0
Olivo R.
Novak D.[4]
6-47-61
Nagal S.[8]
Kolar Z.
6-26-4
Stakhovsky S.
Popko D.
6-36-4
Zuk K.
Vilella Martinez M.
7-652-67-5
Gombos N.[1]
Laaksonen H.
6-766-46-3
Martin A.[3]
Paulson A.
6-36-3
Tabilo A.
Sugita Y.[2]
7-54-0