Norbert Gombos vs Sumit Nagal — Prague 1 CH Quarter-final

Prague 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Norbert Gombos
SVK1
Norbert Gombos
#364ATP
1472ELO
1455Clay ELO
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 3 May 2021
clay
Sumit Nagal
IND8
Sumit Nagal
#219ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
Gombos N.
6-4 6-2
Nagal S.
Gombos N.
662
Nagal S.
420

Norbert Gombos defeated Sumit Nagal 6-4 6-2 in the Prague 1 CH quarter-final on clay. Norbert Gombos extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-04-26MunichQ1clayNorbert Gombos6-4 6-7(2) 6-1
2020-10-19Cologne 2Q1hardSumit Nagal7-5 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Gombos N.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Gombos N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gombos N.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
70%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
1.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gombos N.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
41
33
Break points saved·Clear edge
83
69
Break points won·Dominant
8
35
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
36
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gombos N.Nagal S.
Freshness·Dominant
69
95

Gombos N.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 76 games (7d) · Nagal S.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.
Otte O.
5-76-46-4
Semi-finals
Otte O.
Vrbensky M.
6-36-3
Griekspoor T.
Gombos N.[1]
7-656-3
Quarter-finals
Otte O.
Cressy M.
6-37-5
Vrbensky M.
Kopriva V.
6-16-4
Griekspoor T.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-26-4
Gombos N.[1]
Nagal S.[8]
6-46-2
R16
Cressy M.
Tabilo A.
6-27-5
Otte O.
Lehecka J.
6-13-66-3
Vrbensky M.
Martin A.[3]
6-41-66-4
Kopriva V.
Maden Y.
4-66-46-1
Ferreira Silva F.
Polmans M.
6-23-66-4
Griekspoor T.
Olivo R.
6-37-63
Nagal S.[8]
Stakhovsky S.
4-66-16-4
Gombos N.[1]
Zuk K.
6-36-716-3
R32
Otte O.
Gojowczyk P.[7]
6-36-1
Cressy M.
Safwat M.
6-26-2
Lehecka J.
Safiullin R.
4-66-37-64
Vrbensky M.
Ofner S.
7-646-3
Kopriva V.
Marchenko I.
6-26-747-66
Maden Y.
Kudla D.[5]
6-16-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Majchrzak K.[6]
6-46-756-1
Polmans M.
Marcora R.
7-646-2
Griekspoor T.
Rosol L.
6-36-0
Olivo R.
Novak D.[4]
6-47-61
Nagal S.[8]
Kolar Z.
6-26-4
Stakhovsky S.
Popko D.
6-36-4
Zuk K.
Vilella Martinez M.
7-652-67-5
Gombos N.[1]
Laaksonen H.
6-766-46-3
Martin A.[3]
Paulson A.
6-36-3
Tabilo A.
Sugita Y.[2]
7-54-0