Cem Ilkel vs Nino Serdarusic — Rome 2 CH Quarter-final

Rome 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 April 2021
clay
CRO
Nino Serdarusic
#1471ATP
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWLL
Ilkel C.
7-6 3-6 6-3
Serdarusic N.
Ilkel C.
77362
Serdarusic N.
63631

Cem Ilkel defeated Nino Serdarusic 7-6 3-6 6-3 in the Rome 2 CH quarter-final on clay. Cem Ilkel claimed a first win over Nino Serdarusic in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Cem Ilkel closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-10-12St PetersburgQ1hardNino Serdarusic7-6(5) 3-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Serdarusic N.

Serdarusic N.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Serdarusic N.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
58%
59%
Aces / match·Even
4.7
4.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (191 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Serdarusic N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
8
Break points saved·Clear edge
49
66
Break points won·Even
3
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Cerundolo J.
Cobolli F.
6-23-66-3
Semi-finals
Cerundolo J.
Giannessi A.[8]
4-66-47-5
Cobolli F.
Ilkel C.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Cobolli F.
Pellegrino A.
7-636-1
Cerundolo J.
Zeppieri G.
6-06-3
Ilkel C.
Serdarusic N.
7-633-66-3
Giannessi A.[8]
Kokkinakis T.
7-53-67-5
R16
Cerundolo J.
Muller A.
6-46-3
Kokkinakis T.
Gaio F.[3]
6-786-36-4
Giannessi A.[8]
Clarke J.
6-26-4
Pellegrino A.
Collarini A.
6-36-746-4
Ilkel C.
Giustino L.
6-46-2
Serdarusic N.
Marcora R.
4-66-16-4
Cobolli F.
Petrovic D.[4]
6-26-2
Zeppieri G.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-46-3
R32
Petrovic D.[4]
Sijsling I.
6-17-66
Zeppieri G.
Dellien H.[2]
1-66-36-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Couacaud E.
6-36-4
Cerundolo J.
Lamasine T.
7-57-5
Muller A.
Lorenzi P.[6]
6-46-0
Gaio F.[3]
Bemelmans R.
3-66-36-2
Clarke J.
Bolt A.
6-06-3
Giannessi A.[8]
Andreozzi G.
6-36-3
Collarini A.
Gaston H.[5]
6-16-4
Pellegrino A.
Napolitano S.
6-44-66-4
Cobolli F.
Diez S.
6-46-1
Giustino L.
Varillas J.[7]
6-17-5
Ilkel C.
Masur D.
4-66-47-62
Marcora R.
Vukic A.
6-46-1
Serdarusic N.
Dzumhur D.[1]
6-26-716-3
Kokkinakis T.
Maden Y.
6-36-2