Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Tak Khunn Wang — Salinas 1 CH Round of 16

Salinas 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARG
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
#58ATP
1759ELO
1642Hard ELO
$653kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 April 2021
hard
FRA
Tak Khunn Wang
34 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWLLW
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-1 6-1
Wang T.
Ugo Carabelli C.
662
Wang T.
110

Camilo Ugo Carabelli defeated Tak Khunn Wang 6-1 6-1 in the Salinas 1 CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.serving65% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Wang T.

Wang T.serving65% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Ugo Carabelli C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Ugo Carabelli C.Wang T.
0
Serve
—
5
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.Wang T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
60%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
53%
Service points won·Even
60%
57%
Return points won·Even
41%
44%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
0.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 10). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ugo Carabelli C.Wang T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
78
39
Break points saved·Dominant
90
59
Break points won·Clear edge
62
44
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
60
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
33

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ugo Carabelli C.Wang T.
Freshness·
100
—

Ugo Carabelli C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Jarry N.
Mejia N.
7-676-1
Semi-finals
Jarry N.
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-56-3
Mejia N.
Celikbilek A.[6]
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Jarry N.
Tirante T.
7-636-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-46-4
Mejia N.
Barrios Vera T.[5]
2-66-17-63
Celikbilek A.[6]
Van Rijthoven T.
6-32-67-66
R16
Van Rijthoven T.
Dougaz A.
6-27-5
Tirante T.
King K.
6-16-2
Jarry N.
Sekiguchi S.
6-16-2
Menendez Maceiras A.
Eubanks C.[4]
7-666-1
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Sels J.
6-26-2
Mejia N.
Casanova H.
6-16-2
Celikbilek A.[6]
Ortega Olmedo R.
1-66-46-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Wang T.
6-16-1
R32
Tirante T.
Orlov V.
6-26-746-3
Sels J.
March C.
6-46-3
Mejia N.
Hidalgo D.
6-31-67-5
Casanova H.
Gomez E.[3]
6-43-66-2
Celikbilek A.[6]
Aragone J.
6-27-62
Ortega Olmedo R.
Chappell N.
6-36-2
Dougaz A.
Mansouri S.
6-26-2
Wang T.
Gengel M.
6-26-3
King K.
Tabilo A.[2]
3-66-46-1
Jarry N.
Alvarez N.
6-16-1
Eubanks C.[4]
De Jong J.
7-637-63
Sekiguchi S.
Moriya H.[7]
6-17-65
Van Rijthoven T.
Uchiyama Y.[1]
6-24-0
Menendez Maceiras A.
Uchida K.
6-46-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Quiroz R.[8]
4-66-17-67
Barrios Vera T.[5]
Diaz Acosta F.
6-26-2