Brayden Schnur vs Alejandro Tabilo — Orlando 1 CH Round of 32

Orlando 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
CAN
Brayden Schnur
31 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 April 2021
hard
Alejandro Tabilo
CHI8
Alejandro Tabilo
#31ATP
1819ELO
1750Hard ELO
$1.1MYTD
$5.8MCAREER
29 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWL
Schnur B.
6-2 6-2
Tabilo A.
Schnur B.
662
Tabilo A.
220

Brayden Schnur defeated Alejandro Tabilo 6-2 6-2 in the Orlando 1 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Schnur B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Tabilo A.

Tabilo A.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Schnur B.

Serve advantage — Tabilo A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Schnur B.Tabilo A.
—
Serve
51
—
Return
10

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Schnur B.Tabilo A.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
66%
Aces / match·Even
6.4
6.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (74 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Schnur B.Tabilo A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
27
74
Break points saved·Slight edge
86
97
Break points won·Dominant
4
59
Deciding sets·Dominant
14
91
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
77
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Schnur B.Tabilo A.
Freshness·
—
98

Tabilo A.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Brooksby J.
Kudla D.[5]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Kudla D.[5]
Cid R.
2-66-26-2
Brooksby J.
Harrison C.
7-56-1
Quarter-finals
Brooksby J.
Khan Z.
6-46-3
Harrison C.
Sock J.
7-636-3
Kudla D.[5]
Mmoh M.
7-56-3
Cid R.
Schnur B.
3-66-24-0
R16
Brooksby J.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-1
Sock J.
Gunneswaran P.[6]
6-36-4
Schnur B.
Fratangelo B.
6-37-62
Cid R.
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
7-626-2
Kudla D.[5]
Van Rijthoven T.
5-76-27-5
Mmoh M.
Eubanks C.
3-66-36-2
Harrison C.
Kovacevic A.
6-46-3
Khan Z.
Uchiyama Y.[2]
7-657-65
R32
Khan Z.
King K.
6-31-66-1
Celikbilek A.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-26-3
Brooksby J.
Jung J.[7]
6-16-4
Harrison C.
Mcdonald M.[3]
7-56-3
Kovacevic A.
Quiroz R.
6-15-76-4
Gunneswaran P.[6]
Ebden M.
6-46-1
Schnur B.
Tabilo A.[8]
6-26-2
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Mena F.
6-26-0
Kudla D.[5]
Menezes J.
6-26-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Krueger M.
6-36-4
Eubanks C.
Johnson S.[1]
6-17-63
Cid R.
Torpegaard M.
7-626-3
Sock J.
Watanuki Y.
6-16-1
Mmoh M.
Damm M.
6-44-66-1
Fratangelo B.
Gomez E.
3-66-46-1
Uchiyama Y.[2]
Polansky P.
6-33-66-4