Yasutaka Uchiyama vs Peter Polansky — Orlando 1 CH Round of 32

Orlando 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Yasutaka Uchiyama
JPN2
Yasutaka Uchiyama
#336ATP
1463ELO
1431Hard ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 April 2021
hard
CAN
Peter Polansky
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
Uchiyama Y.
6-3 3-6 6-4
Polansky P.
Uchiyama Y.
6362
Polansky P.
3641

Yasutaka Uchiyama defeated Peter Polansky 6-3 3-6 6-4 in the Orlando 1 CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Peter Polansky came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Yasutaka Uchiyama claimed a first win over Peter Polansky in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-07-31Los CabosR32hardPeter Polansky7-5 7-6(5)

Serve vs return

This season
Uchiyama Y.serving91% hold

wins 71% of points on serve vs Polansky P.

Polansky P.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Uchiyama Y.

Serve advantage — Uchiyama Y.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Uchiyama Y.Polansky P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
34%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.9
4.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 43). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Uchiyama Y.Polansky P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
30
18
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
82
Break points won·Slight edge
2
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
45
16
Tiebreaks·Even
23
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Brooksby J.
Kudla D.[5]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Kudla D.[5]
Cid R.
2-66-26-2
Brooksby J.
Harrison C.
7-56-1
Quarter-finals
Brooksby J.
Khan Z.
6-46-3
Harrison C.
Sock J.
7-636-3
Kudla D.[5]
Mmoh M.
7-56-3
Cid R.
Schnur B.
3-66-24-0
R16
Brooksby J.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-1
Sock J.
Gunneswaran P.[6]
6-36-4
Schnur B.
Fratangelo B.
6-37-62
Cid R.
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
7-626-2
Kudla D.[5]
Van Rijthoven T.
5-76-27-5
Mmoh M.
Eubanks C.
3-66-36-2
Harrison C.
Kovacevic A.
6-46-3
Khan Z.
Uchiyama Y.[2]
7-657-65
R32
Khan Z.
King K.
6-31-66-1
Celikbilek A.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-26-3
Brooksby J.
Jung J.[7]
6-16-4
Harrison C.
Mcdonald M.[3]
7-56-3
Kovacevic A.
Quiroz R.
6-15-76-4
Gunneswaran P.[6]
Ebden M.
6-46-1
Schnur B.
Tabilo A.[8]
6-26-2
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Mena F.
6-26-0
Kudla D.[5]
Menezes J.
6-26-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Krueger M.
6-36-4
Eubanks C.
Johnson S.[1]
6-17-63
Cid R.
Torpegaard M.
7-626-3
Sock J.
Watanuki Y.
6-16-1
Mmoh M.
Damm M.
6-44-66-1
Fratangelo B.
Gomez E.
3-66-46-1
Uchiyama Y.[2]
Polansky P.
6-33-66-4