Astra Sharma vs Camila Osorio — Charleston 2 Semi-final

Charleston 2 · WTA · Semi-final
AUS
Astra Sharma
#597WTA
1512ELO
1496Clay ELO
30 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 April 2021
clay
Camila Osorio
COL
Camila Osorio
#53WTA
1807ELO
1731Clay ELO
24 yrs · 162 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWL
Sharma A.
7-6 6-1
Osorio C.
Sharma A.
7762
Osorio C.
6510

Astra Sharma defeated Camila Osorio 7-6 6-1 in the Charleston 2 semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Camila Osorio came in ranked #53.

Key context

  • Match story: Astra Sharma came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sharma A.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Osorio C.

Osorio C.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Sharma A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sharma A.Osorio C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
61%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
48%
43%
Service points won·Even
58%
54%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
47%
Break points saved·Even
56%
53%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.2
1.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.1
5.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (182 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sharma A.Osorio C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
27
84
Break points saved·Clear edge
58
73
Break points won·Dominant
64
99
Deciding sets·Dominant
33
96
Tiebreaks·Dominant
42
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Sharma A.Osorio C.
Freshness·
—
95

Osorio C.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Sharma A.
Jabeur O.[1]
2-67-56-1
Semi-finals
Jabeur O.[1]
Kovinic D.
6-36-0
Sharma A.
Osorio C.
7-656-1
Quarter-finals
Osorio C.
Tauson C.
6-41-0
Sharma A.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-46-3
Kovinic D.
Rogers S.[3]
7-56-1
Jabeur O.[1]
Hibino N.
6-06-1
R16
Tauson C.
Tomljanovic A.[6]
6-16-4
Osorio C.
Mchale C.
2-67-627-61
Rogers S.[3]
Liu C.
6-26-2
Hibino N.
Di Lorenzo F.
6-46-3
Jabeur O.[1]
Parks A.
6-46-0
Kovinic D.
Davis L.[7]
6-11-66-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Navarro E.
6-46-2
Sharma A.
Brengle M.[8]
6-44-67-5
R32
Fruhvirtova L.
Cornet A.[4]
6-26-774-4
Navarro E.
Martincova T.
6-33-2
Hibino N.
Doi M.[5]
7-55-76-6
Rogers S.[3]
Mcnally C.
6-06-1
Liu C.
Hunter S.
7-54-66-0
Di Lorenzo F.
Ahn K.
7-666-2
Davis L.[7]
Vandeweghe C.
7-636-4
Jabeur O.[1]
Voegele S.
6-46-1
Kovinic D.
Tomova V.
6-36-3
Sharma A.
Wang Y.
6-46-2
Tomljanovic A.[6]
Zarazua R.
6-16-1
Osorio C.
Linette M.[2]
6-34-67-5
Parks A.
Min G.
6-16-4
Mchale C.
Errani S.
7-636-3
Brengle M.[8]
Vikhlyantseva N.
6-03-66-2
Tauson C.
Samsonova L.
6-36-3