Shelby Rogers vs Claire Liu — Charleston 2 Round of 16

Charleston 2 · WTA · Round of 16
USA3
Shelby Rogers
33 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 April 2021
clay
Claire Liu
USA
Claire Liu
#111WTA
1669ELO
1623Clay ELO
26 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWWWWWL
Rogers S.
6-2 6-2
Liu C.
Rogers S.
662
Liu C.
220

Shelby Rogers defeated Claire Liu 6-2 6-2 in the Charleston 2 round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Shelby Rogers came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Shelby Rogers extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-04-01CharlestonR64clayShelby Rogers6-1 6-1
2023-02-20DubaiR64hardShelby Rogers6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Rogers S.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Liu C.

Liu C.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Rogers S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rogers S.Liu C.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
45%
Service points won·Even
59%
56%
Return points won·Even
41%
44%
Break points saved·Even
58%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.9
3.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (134 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rogers S.Liu C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
42
61
Break points saved·Clear edge
86
64
Break points won·Slight edge
84
78
Deciding sets·Dominant
15
79
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
54
67

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Rogers S.Liu C.
Freshness·
—
71

Liu C.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 54 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Sharma A.
Jabeur O.[1]
2-67-56-1
Semi-finals
Jabeur O.[1]
Kovinic D.
6-36-0
Sharma A.
Osorio C.
7-656-1
Quarter-finals
Osorio C.
Tauson C.
6-41-0
Sharma A.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-46-3
Kovinic D.
Rogers S.[3]
7-56-1
Jabeur O.[1]
Hibino N.
6-06-1
R16
Tauson C.
Tomljanovic A.[6]
6-16-4
Osorio C.
Mchale C.
2-67-627-61
Rogers S.[3]
Liu C.
6-26-2
Hibino N.
Di Lorenzo F.
6-46-3
Jabeur O.[1]
Parks A.
6-46-0
Kovinic D.
Davis L.[7]
6-11-66-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Navarro E.
6-46-2
Sharma A.
Brengle M.[8]
6-44-67-5
R32
Fruhvirtova L.
Cornet A.[4]
6-26-774-4
Navarro E.
Martincova T.
6-33-2
Hibino N.
Doi M.[5]
7-55-76-6
Rogers S.[3]
Mcnally C.
6-06-1
Liu C.
Hunter S.
7-54-66-0
Di Lorenzo F.
Ahn K.
7-666-2
Davis L.[7]
Vandeweghe C.
7-636-4
Jabeur O.[1]
Voegele S.
6-46-1
Kovinic D.
Tomova V.
6-36-3
Sharma A.
Wang Y.
6-46-2
Tomljanovic A.[6]
Zarazua R.
6-16-1
Osorio C.
Linette M.[2]
6-34-67-5
Parks A.
Min G.
6-16-4
Mchale C.
Errani S.
7-636-3
Brengle M.[8]
Vikhlyantseva N.
6-03-66-2
Tauson C.
Samsonova L.
6-36-3