Denis Kudla vs Michael Mmoh — Orlando 1 CH Quarter-final

Orlando 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA5
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 April 2021
hard
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
Kudla D.
7-5 6-3
Mmoh M.
Kudla D.
762
Mmoh M.
530

Denis Kudla defeated Michael Mmoh 7-5 6-3 in the Orlando 1 CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Denis Kudla came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Denis Kudla extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Denis Kudla closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-08-01WashingtonR64hardDenis Kudla1-6 6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Kudla D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Mmoh M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kudla D.Mmoh M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Even
5.6
6.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kudla D.Mmoh M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
50
66
Break points saved·Even
90
91
Break points won·Clear edge
19
31
Deciding sets·Slight edge
81
90
Tiebreaks·Dominant
30
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kudla D.Mmoh M.
Freshness·
—
95

Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Brooksby J.
Kudla D.[5]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Kudla D.[5]
Cid R.
2-66-26-2
Brooksby J.
Harrison C.
7-56-1
Quarter-finals
Brooksby J.
Khan Z.
6-46-3
Harrison C.
Sock J.
7-636-3
Kudla D.[5]
Mmoh M.
7-56-3
Cid R.
Schnur B.
3-66-24-0
R16
Brooksby J.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-1
Sock J.
Gunneswaran P.[6]
6-36-4
Schnur B.
Fratangelo B.
6-37-62
Cid R.
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
7-626-2
Kudla D.[5]
Van Rijthoven T.
5-76-27-5
Mmoh M.
Eubanks C.
3-66-36-2
Harrison C.
Kovacevic A.
6-46-3
Khan Z.
Uchiyama Y.[2]
7-657-65
R32
Khan Z.
King K.
6-31-66-1
Celikbilek A.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-26-3
Brooksby J.
Jung J.[7]
6-16-4
Harrison C.
Mcdonald M.[3]
7-56-3
Kovacevic A.
Quiroz R.
6-15-76-4
Gunneswaran P.[6]
Ebden M.
6-46-1
Schnur B.
Tabilo A.[8]
6-26-2
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Mena F.
6-26-0
Kudla D.[5]
Menezes J.
6-26-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Krueger M.
6-36-4
Eubanks C.
Johnson S.[1]
6-17-63
Cid R.
Torpegaard M.
7-626-3
Sock J.
Watanuki Y.
6-16-1
Mmoh M.
Damm M.
6-44-66-1
Fratangelo B.
Gomez E.
3-66-46-1
Uchiyama Y.[2]
Polansky P.
6-33-66-4