Tim Van Rijthoven vs Mitchell Krueger — Orlando 1 CH Round of 32

Orlando 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
NED
Tim Van Rijthoven
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 April 2021
hard
Mitchell Krueger
USA
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
Van Rijthoven T.
6-3 6-4
Krueger M.
Van Rijthoven T.
662
Krueger M.
340

Tim Van Rijthoven defeated Mitchell Krueger 6-3 6-4 in the Orlando 1 CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Mitchell Krueger came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Tim Van Rijthoven claimed a first win over Mitchell Krueger in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-07-11NewportR32grassMitchell Krueger7-6(7) 4-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Van Rijthoven T.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Krueger M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Van Rijthoven T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Van Rijthoven T.Krueger M.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
69%
63%
Return points won·Even
34%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.6
4.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.2
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (119 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van Rijthoven T.Krueger M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
26
16
Break points saved·Even
90
87
Break points won·Clear edge
1
14
Deciding sets·Slight edge
19
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
61
0

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Van Rijthoven T.Krueger M.
Freshness·
—
87

Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Brooksby J.
Kudla D.[5]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Kudla D.[5]
Cid R.
2-66-26-2
Brooksby J.
Harrison C.
7-56-1
Quarter-finals
Brooksby J.
Khan Z.
6-46-3
Harrison C.
Sock J.
7-636-3
Kudla D.[5]
Mmoh M.
7-56-3
Cid R.
Schnur B.
3-66-24-0
R16
Brooksby J.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-1
Sock J.
Gunneswaran P.[6]
6-36-4
Schnur B.
Fratangelo B.
6-37-62
Cid R.
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
7-626-2
Kudla D.[5]
Van Rijthoven T.
5-76-27-5
Mmoh M.
Eubanks C.
3-66-36-2
Harrison C.
Kovacevic A.
6-46-3
Khan Z.
Uchiyama Y.[2]
7-657-65
R32
Khan Z.
King K.
6-31-66-1
Celikbilek A.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-26-3
Brooksby J.
Jung J.[7]
6-16-4
Harrison C.
Mcdonald M.[3]
7-56-3
Kovacevic A.
Quiroz R.
6-15-76-4
Gunneswaran P.[6]
Ebden M.
6-46-1
Schnur B.
Tabilo A.[8]
6-26-2
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Mena F.
6-26-0
Kudla D.[5]
Menezes J.
6-26-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Krueger M.
6-36-4
Eubanks C.
Johnson S.[1]
6-17-63
Cid R.
Torpegaard M.
7-626-3
Sock J.
Watanuki Y.
6-16-1
Mmoh M.
Damm M.
6-44-66-1
Fratangelo B.
Gomez E.
3-66-46-1
Uchiyama Y.[2]
Polansky P.
6-33-66-4