Ons Jabeur vs Nao Hibino — Charleston 2 Quarter-final

Charleston 2 · WTA · Quarter-final
TUN1
Ons Jabeur
31 yrs · 167 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 April 2021
clay
Nao Hibino
JPN
Nao Hibino
#235WTA
1560ELO
1487Clay ELO
31 yrs · 163 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWWLWW
Jabeur O.
6-0 6-1
Hibino N.
Jabeur O.
662
Hibino N.
010

Ons Jabeur defeated Nao Hibino 6-0 6-1 in the Charleston 2 quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Ons Jabeur came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Ons Jabeur extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-09-28Roland GarrosR64clayOns Jabeur7-6(4) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Jabeur O.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Hibino N.

Hibino N.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Jabeur O.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jabeur O.Hibino N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
47%
Service points won·Even
59%
56%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Even
57%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
1.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jabeur O.Hibino N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
53
Break points saved·Dominant
90
39
Break points won·Slight edge
96
91
Deciding sets·Dominant
95
66
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
90
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Jabeur O.Hibino N.
Freshness·
—
91

Hibino N.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Sharma A.
Jabeur O.[1]
2-67-56-1
Semi-finals
Jabeur O.[1]
Kovinic D.
6-36-0
Sharma A.
Osorio C.
7-656-1
Quarter-finals
Osorio C.
Tauson C.
6-41-0
Sharma A.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-46-3
Kovinic D.
Rogers S.[3]
7-56-1
Jabeur O.[1]
Hibino N.
6-06-1
R16
Tauson C.
Tomljanovic A.[6]
6-16-4
Osorio C.
Mchale C.
2-67-627-61
Rogers S.[3]
Liu C.
6-26-2
Hibino N.
Di Lorenzo F.
6-46-3
Jabeur O.[1]
Parks A.
6-46-0
Kovinic D.
Davis L.[7]
6-11-66-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Navarro E.
6-46-2
Sharma A.
Brengle M.[8]
6-44-67-5
R32
Fruhvirtova L.
Cornet A.[4]
6-26-774-4
Navarro E.
Martincova T.
6-33-2
Hibino N.
Doi M.[5]
7-55-76-6
Rogers S.[3]
Mcnally C.
6-06-1
Liu C.
Hunter S.
7-54-66-0
Di Lorenzo F.
Ahn K.
7-666-2
Davis L.[7]
Vandeweghe C.
7-636-4
Jabeur O.[1]
Voegele S.
6-46-1
Kovinic D.
Tomova V.
6-36-3
Sharma A.
Wang Y.
6-46-2
Tomljanovic A.[6]
Zarazua R.
6-16-1
Osorio C.
Linette M.[2]
6-34-67-5
Parks A.
Min G.
6-16-4
Mchale C.
Errani S.
7-636-3
Brengle M.[8]
Vikhlyantseva N.
6-03-66-2
Tauson C.
Samsonova L.
6-36-3