Nao Hibino vs Misaki Doi — Charleston 2 Round of 32

Charleston 2 · WTA · Round of 32
Nao Hibino
JPN
Nao Hibino
#246WTA
1560ELO
1487Clay ELO
31 yrs · 163 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWL
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 12 April 2021
clay
JPN5
Misaki Doi
35 yrs · 159 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLWLLW
Hibino N.
7-5 5-7 6-6
Doi M.
Hibino N.
756–
Doi M.
576–

Nao Hibino advanced when Misaki Doi retired 7-5 5-7 6-6 in the Charleston 2 round of 32. Nao Hibino narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-09-09HiroshimaFhardNao Hibino6-3 6-2
2017-01-30TaipeiR32hardMisaki Doi6-2 2-6 6-4
2016-07-18StanfordR16hardMisaki Doi6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Hibino N.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Doi M.

Doi M.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Hibino N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hibino N.Doi M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
61%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
45%
Service points won·Even
56%
55%
Return points won·Even
44%
41%
Break points saved·Even
54%
54%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.9
1.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 78). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hibino N.Doi M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
8
Break points saved·Slight edge
39
33
Break points won·Dominant
91
44
Deciding sets·Dominant
66
24
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Hibino N.Doi M.
Freshness·
100
—

Hibino N.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Sharma A.
Jabeur O.[1]
2-67-56-1
Semi-finals
Jabeur O.[1]
Kovinic D.
6-36-0
Sharma A.
Osorio C.
7-656-1
Quarter-finals
Osorio C.
Tauson C.
6-41-0
Sharma A.
Fruhvirtova L.
6-46-3
Kovinic D.
Rogers S.[3]
7-56-1
Jabeur O.[1]
Hibino N.
6-06-1
R16
Tauson C.
Tomljanovic A.[6]
6-16-4
Osorio C.
Mchale C.
2-67-627-61
Rogers S.[3]
Liu C.
6-26-2
Hibino N.
Di Lorenzo F.
6-46-3
Jabeur O.[1]
Parks A.
6-46-0
Kovinic D.
Davis L.[7]
6-11-66-3
Fruhvirtova L.
Navarro E.
6-46-2
Sharma A.
Brengle M.[8]
6-44-67-5
R32
Fruhvirtova L.
Cornet A.[4]
6-26-774-4
Navarro E.
Martincova T.
6-33-2
Hibino N.
Doi M.[5]
7-55-76-6
Rogers S.[3]
Mcnally C.
6-06-1
Liu C.
Hunter S.
7-54-66-0
Di Lorenzo F.
Ahn K.
7-666-2
Davis L.[7]
Vandeweghe C.
7-636-4
Jabeur O.[1]
Voegele S.
6-46-1
Kovinic D.
Tomova V.
6-36-3
Sharma A.
Wang Y.
6-46-2
Tomljanovic A.[6]
Zarazua R.
6-16-1
Osorio C.
Linette M.[2]
6-34-67-5
Parks A.
Min G.
6-16-4
Mchale C.
Errani S.
7-636-3
Brengle M.[8]
Vikhlyantseva N.
6-03-66-2
Tauson C.
Samsonova L.
6-36-3