Michael Mmoh vs Martin Damm — Orlando 1 CH Round of 32

Orlando 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Michael Mmoh
USA
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 April 2021
hard
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#104ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Mmoh M.
6-4 4-6 6-1
Damm M.
Mmoh M.
6462
Damm M.
4611

Michael Mmoh defeated Martin Damm 6-4 4-6 6-1 in the Orlando 1 CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #104.

Key context

  • Match story: Michael Mmoh came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–4 4–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Mmoh M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Damm M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mmoh M.Damm M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
67%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
34%
Break points saved·Even
62%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.0
12.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.8
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 169). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mmoh M.Damm M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
26
Break points saved·Even
91
93
Break points won·Dominant
31
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
5
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
77
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Mmoh M.Damm M.
Freshness·Even
95
97

Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Damm M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Brooksby J.
Kudla D.[5]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Kudla D.[5]
Cid R.
2-66-26-2
Brooksby J.
Harrison C.
7-56-1
Quarter-finals
Brooksby J.
Khan Z.
6-46-3
Harrison C.
Sock J.
7-636-3
Kudla D.[5]
Mmoh M.
7-56-3
Cid R.
Schnur B.
3-66-24-0
R16
Brooksby J.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-1
Sock J.
Gunneswaran P.[6]
6-36-4
Schnur B.
Fratangelo B.
6-37-62
Cid R.
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
7-626-2
Kudla D.[5]
Van Rijthoven T.
5-76-27-5
Mmoh M.
Eubanks C.
3-66-36-2
Harrison C.
Kovacevic A.
6-46-3
Khan Z.
Uchiyama Y.[2]
7-657-65
R32
Khan Z.
King K.
6-31-66-1
Celikbilek A.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-26-3
Brooksby J.
Jung J.[7]
6-16-4
Harrison C.
Mcdonald M.[3]
7-56-3
Kovacevic A.
Quiroz R.
6-15-76-4
Gunneswaran P.[6]
Ebden M.
6-46-1
Schnur B.
Tabilo A.[8]
6-26-2
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Mena F.
6-26-0
Kudla D.[5]
Menezes J.
6-26-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Krueger M.
6-36-4
Eubanks C.
Johnson S.[1]
6-17-63
Cid R.
Torpegaard M.
7-626-3
Sock J.
Watanuki Y.
6-16-1
Mmoh M.
Damm M.
6-44-66-1
Fratangelo B.
Gomez E.
3-66-46-1
Uchiyama Y.[2]
Polansky P.
6-33-66-4