Cem Ilkel vs Enzo Couacaud — Split 2 CH Round of 32

Split 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 April 2021
clay
FRA
Enzo Couacaud
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLWWL
Ilkel C.
6-2 7-6
Couacaud E.
Ilkel C.
6772
Couacaud E.
2640

Cem Ilkel defeated Enzo Couacaud 6-2 7-6 in the Split 2 CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Enzo Couacaud came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Cem Ilkel claimed a first win over Enzo Couacaud in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Cem Ilkel closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–6.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-01-17Australian OpenQ1hardEnzo Couacaud6-3 6-7(4) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Couacaud E.

Couacaud E.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Serve advantage — Couacaud E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Couacaud E.
1st serve in·Even
58%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
6.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (191 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Couacaud E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
47
Break points saved·Dominant
49
79
Break points won·Dominant
3
29
Deciding sets·Slight edge
70
77
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
29

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Zuk K.
Bourgue M.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Zuk K.
Ymer E.
6-756-06-1
Bourgue M.
Halys Q.
7-680-0
Quarter-finals
Ymer E.
Ilkel C.
6-36-4
Bourgue M.
Basic M.
6-41-67-5
Halys Q.
Kokkinakis T.
6-37-62
Zuk K.
Vukic A.
6-46-1
R16
Vukic A.
Kolar Z.
7-656-4
Zuk K.
Marterer M.
6-47-64
Ilkel C.
Gaston H.[3]
2-66-37-67
Ymer E.
Serdarusic N.
7-625-76-3
Basic M.
Collarini A.
6-46-4
Bourgue M.
Domingues J.
6-36-4
Kokkinakis T.
Horansky F.[7]
6-16-2
Halys Q.
Cachin P.
6-27-62
R32
Vukic A.
Kekez D.
6-27-64
Kolar Z.
Polmans M.[2]
6-26-2
Zuk K.
Rosol L.
6-47-64
Marterer M.
Diez S.[8]
6-37-5
Gaston H.[3]
Klein L.
6-33-66-3
Ilkel C.
Couacaud E.
6-27-64
Serdarusic N.
Coppejans K.[5]
6-36-4
Collarini A.
Giustino L.[6]
6-46-4
Basic M.
Istomin D.
6-36-1
Domingues J.
Bolt A.
6-16-3
Bourgue M.
Safwat M.[4]
3-66-26-4
Horansky F.[7]
Brown D.
7-56-2
Kokkinakis T.
Ajdukovic D.
6-45-76-3
Halys Q.
Masur D.
6-36-2
Cachin P.
Barrere G.[1]
6-36-3
Ymer E.
Muller A.
7-56-4