Roberto Cid vs Thiago Seyboth Wild — Orlando 1 CH Round of 16

Orlando 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
DOM
Roberto Cid
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 April 2021
hard
Thiago Seyboth Wild
BRA4
Thiago Seyboth Wild
#284ATP
1532ELO
1516Hard ELO
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
Cid R.
7-6 6-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Cid R.
7762
Seyboth Wild T.
6220

Roberto Cid defeated Thiago Seyboth Wild 7-6 6-2 in the Orlando 1 CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Roberto Cid closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cid R.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Seyboth Wild T.

Seyboth Wild T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Cid R.

Serve advantage — Seyboth Wild T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cid R.Seyboth Wild T.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
56%
64%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Clear edge
51%
64%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.0
4.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (79 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cid R.Seyboth Wild T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
27
Break points saved·Dominant
15
93
Break points won·Even
26
25
Deciding sets·Clear edge
4
20
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
1
16

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Cid R.Seyboth Wild T.
Freshness·
—
90

Seyboth Wild T.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Brooksby J.
Kudla D.[5]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Kudla D.[5]
Cid R.
2-66-26-2
Brooksby J.
Harrison C.
7-56-1
Quarter-finals
Brooksby J.
Khan Z.
6-46-3
Harrison C.
Sock J.
7-636-3
Kudla D.[5]
Mmoh M.
7-56-3
Cid R.
Schnur B.
3-66-24-0
R16
Brooksby J.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-1
Sock J.
Gunneswaran P.[6]
6-36-4
Schnur B.
Fratangelo B.
6-37-62
Cid R.
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
7-626-2
Kudla D.[5]
Van Rijthoven T.
5-76-27-5
Mmoh M.
Eubanks C.
3-66-36-2
Harrison C.
Kovacevic A.
6-46-3
Khan Z.
Uchiyama Y.[2]
7-657-65
R32
Khan Z.
King K.
6-31-66-1
Celikbilek A.
Kwiatkowski T.
6-26-3
Brooksby J.
Jung J.[7]
6-16-4
Harrison C.
Mcdonald M.[3]
7-56-3
Kovacevic A.
Quiroz R.
6-15-76-4
Gunneswaran P.[6]
Ebden M.
6-46-1
Schnur B.
Tabilo A.[8]
6-26-2
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Mena F.
6-26-0
Kudla D.[5]
Menezes J.
6-26-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Krueger M.
6-36-4
Eubanks C.
Johnson S.[1]
6-17-63
Cid R.
Torpegaard M.
7-626-3
Sock J.
Watanuki Y.
6-16-1
Mmoh M.
Damm M.
6-44-66-1
Fratangelo B.
Gomez E.
3-66-46-1
Uchiyama Y.[2]
Polansky P.
6-33-66-4