Liudmila Samsonova vs Nao Hibino — Charleston 1 Round of 64

Charleston 1 · WTA · Round of 64
Liudmila Samsonova
RUS
Liudmila Samsonova
#69WTA
1775ELO
1718Clay ELO
$722kYTD
$8.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 April 2021
clay
Nao Hibino
JPN
Nao Hibino
#235WTA
1560ELO
1487Clay ELO
31 yrs · 163 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWWLWW
Samsonova L.
6-2 6-1
Hibino N.
Samsonova L.
662
Hibino N.
210

Liudmila Samsonova defeated Nao Hibino 6-2 6-1 in the Charleston 1 round of 64 on clay. The result followed the form book — Liudmila Samsonova came in ranked #69.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Samsonova L.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Hibino N.

Hibino N.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Samsonova L.

Serve advantage — Samsonova L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Samsonova L.Hibino N.
1st serve in·Clear edge
55%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
60%
56%
Return points won·Even
43%
44%
Break points saved·Even
58%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
1.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.1
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Samsonova L.Hibino N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
69
53
Break points saved·Dominant
93
39
Break points won·Even
94
91
Deciding sets·Slight edge
61
66
Tiebreaks·Dominant
55
81

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Samsonova L.Hibino N.
Freshness·Even
90
91

Samsonova L.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Hibino N.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Kudermetova V.[15]
Kovinic D.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Kudermetova V.[15]
Badosa P.
6-36-3
Kovinic D.
Jabeur O.[12]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Kudermetova V.[15]
Stephens S.
6-36-4
Badosa P.
Barty A.[1]
6-46-3
Kovinic D.
Putintseva Y.[11]
6-727-56-1
Jabeur O.[12]
Gauff C.[14]
6-36-3
R16
Putintseva Y.[11]
Muguruza G.[6]
0-62-2
Badosa P.
Mcnally C.
6-36-3
Stephens S.
Tomljanovic A.
6-36-4
Kovinic D.
Kvitova P.[3]
6-46-1
Gauff C.[14]
Davis L.
6-27-62
Kudermetova V.[15]
Nara K.
6-06-3
Barty A.[1]
Rogers S.
7-634-66-4
Jabeur O.[12]
Cornet A.
5-76-36-3
R32
Cornet A.
Mertens E.[7]
7-56-3
Barty A.[1]
Doi M.
6-26-1
Rogers S.
Anisimova A.[13]
1-67-56-4
Badosa P.
Bencic B.[5]
6-26-726-1
Nara K.
Osuigwe W.
6-16-4
Tomljanovic A.
Bouzkova M.[17]
4-67-57-5
Stephens S.
Keys M.[8]
6-46-4
Muguruza G.[6]
Frech M.
6-16-3
Kovinic D.
Fernandez L.
6-43-66-3
Kvitova P.[3]
Hunter S.
7-646-2
Jabeur O.[12]
Baptiste H.
6-36-3
Gauff C.[14]
Samsonova L.
4-66-16-4
Davis L.
Kenin S.[2]
4-66-36-4
Kudermetova V.[15]
Navarro E.
6-46-4
Mcnally C.
Sevastova A.
7-632-66-4
Putintseva Y.[11]
Diyas Z.
6-26-2
R64
Mcnally C.
Rybakina E.[10]
6-40-0
Rogers S.
Mladenovic K.
6-46-3
Diyas Z.
Vikhlyantseva N.
6-36-1
Putintseva Y.[11]
Dart H.
7-686-4
Gauff C.[14]
Pironkova T.
6-36-0
Sevastova A.
Potapova A.
6-36-3
Doi M.
Shvedova Y.
6-36-3
Badosa P.
Gracheva V.
3-67-56-1
Fernandez L.
Zhang S.[16]
6-36-1
Kovinic D.
Lee G.
7-626-4
Hunter S.
Muhammad A.
6-26-4
Cornet A.
Pera B.
4-66-46-4
Baptiste H.
Dolehide C.
6-36-3
Samsonova L.
Hibino N.
6-26-1
Frech M.
Min G.
6-26-4
Nara K.
Di Lorenzo F.
6-26-2
Kudermetova V.[15]
Krawczyk D.
6-16-2
Bouzkova M.[17]
Babos T.
6-27-5
Tomljanovic A.
Mchale C.
6-36-0
Stephens S.
Wang X.
6-26-4
Jabeur O.[12]
Trevisan M.
6-26-2
Navarro E.
Zarazua R.
6-46-3
Davis L.
Brengle M.
6-46-2
Anisimova A.[13]
Linette M.
5-76-26-3