Coco Gauff vs Lauren Davis — Charleston 1 Round of 16

Charleston 1 · WTA · Round of 16
Coco Gauff
USA14
Coco Gauff
#7WTA
2071ELO
2018Clay ELO
$2.9MYTD
$33MCAREER
22 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 April 2021
clay
USA
Lauren Davis
#1383WTA
32 yrs · 157 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
Gauff C.
6-2 7-6
Davis L.
Gauff C.
6772
Davis L.
2620

Coco Gauff defeated Lauren Davis 6-2 7-6 in the Charleston 1 round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Coco Gauff came in ranked #7.

Key context

  • Match story: Coco Gauff closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gauff C.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Davis L.

Davis L.serving55% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Gauff C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gauff C.Davis L.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
46%
Service points won·Even
59%
56%
Return points won·Even
48%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
51%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.4
1.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
5.8
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 177). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gauff C.Davis L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
99
51
Break points saved·Dominant
96
26
Break points won·Clear edge
100
79
Deciding sets·Clear edge
100
86
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
99
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gauff C.Davis L.
Freshness·
54
—

Gauff C.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 85 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Kudermetova V.[15]
Kovinic D.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Kudermetova V.[15]
Badosa P.
6-36-3
Kovinic D.
Jabeur O.[12]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Kudermetova V.[15]
Stephens S.
6-36-4
Badosa P.
Barty A.[1]
6-46-3
Kovinic D.
Putintseva Y.[11]
6-727-56-1
Jabeur O.[12]
Gauff C.[14]
6-36-3
R16
Putintseva Y.[11]
Muguruza G.[6]
0-62-2
Badosa P.
Mcnally C.
6-36-3
Stephens S.
Tomljanovic A.
6-36-4
Kovinic D.
Kvitova P.[3]
6-46-1
Gauff C.[14]
Davis L.
6-27-62
Kudermetova V.[15]
Nara K.
6-06-3
Barty A.[1]
Rogers S.
7-634-66-4
Jabeur O.[12]
Cornet A.
5-76-36-3
R32
Cornet A.
Mertens E.[7]
7-56-3
Barty A.[1]
Doi M.
6-26-1
Rogers S.
Anisimova A.[13]
1-67-56-4
Badosa P.
Bencic B.[5]
6-26-726-1
Nara K.
Osuigwe W.
6-16-4
Tomljanovic A.
Bouzkova M.[17]
4-67-57-5
Stephens S.
Keys M.[8]
6-46-4
Muguruza G.[6]
Frech M.
6-16-3
Kovinic D.
Fernandez L.
6-43-66-3
Kvitova P.[3]
Hunter S.
7-646-2
Jabeur O.[12]
Baptiste H.
6-36-3
Gauff C.[14]
Samsonova L.
4-66-16-4
Davis L.
Kenin S.[2]
4-66-36-4
Kudermetova V.[15]
Navarro E.
6-46-4
Mcnally C.
Sevastova A.
7-632-66-4
Putintseva Y.[11]
Diyas Z.
6-26-2
R64
Mcnally C.
Rybakina E.[10]
6-40-0
Rogers S.
Mladenovic K.
6-46-3
Diyas Z.
Vikhlyantseva N.
6-36-1
Putintseva Y.[11]
Dart H.
7-686-4
Gauff C.[14]
Pironkova T.
6-36-0
Sevastova A.
Potapova A.
6-36-3
Doi M.
Shvedova Y.
6-36-3
Badosa P.
Gracheva V.
3-67-56-1
Fernandez L.
Zhang S.[16]
6-36-1
Kovinic D.
Lee G.
7-626-4
Hunter S.
Muhammad A.
6-26-4
Cornet A.
Pera B.
4-66-46-4
Baptiste H.
Dolehide C.
6-36-3
Samsonova L.
Hibino N.
6-26-1
Frech M.
Min G.
6-26-4
Nara K.
Di Lorenzo F.
6-26-2
Kudermetova V.[15]
Krawczyk D.
6-16-2
Bouzkova M.[17]
Babos T.
6-27-5
Tomljanovic A.
Mchale C.
6-36-0
Stephens S.
Wang X.
6-26-4
Jabeur O.[12]
Trevisan M.
6-26-2
Navarro E.
Zarazua R.
6-46-3
Davis L.
Brengle M.
6-46-2
Anisimova A.[13]
Linette M.
5-76-26-3