Vitaliy Sachko vs Roman Safiullin — Lugano CH Quarter-final

Lugano CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Vitaliy Sachko
UKR
Vitaliy Sachko
#198ATP
1584ELO
1475Hard ELO
$158kYTD
$835kCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 March 2021
hard
Roman Safiullin
RUS6
Roman Safiullin
#132ATP
1750ELO
1704Hard ELO
$199kYTD
$4.3MCAREER
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWLWW
Sachko V.
6-4 6-3
Safiullin R.
Sachko V.
662
Safiullin R.
430

Vitaliy Sachko defeated Roman Safiullin 6-4 6-3 in the Lugano CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Roman Safiullin came in ranked #132.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sachko V.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Safiullin R.

Safiullin R.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Sachko V.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sachko V.Safiullin R.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.4
6.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sachko V.Safiullin R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
68
Break points saved·Clear edge
81
96
Break points won·Even
48
44
Deciding sets·Even
76
76
Tiebreaks·Dominant
19
78

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Sachko V.Safiullin R.
Freshness·Clear edge
89
74

Sachko V.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d) · Safiullin R.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 40 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Stricker D.
Sachko V.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Sachko V.
Celikbilek A.
7-56-0
Stricker D.
Sugita Y.[1]
5-76-46-4
Quarter-finals
Celikbilek A.
Grenier H.
4-66-46-3
Sachko V.
Safiullin R.[6]
6-46-3
Stricker D.
Masur D.
6-26-4
Sugita Y.[1]
Karlovskiy E.
7-644-67-62
R16
Grenier H.
Tomic B.
6-44-67-5
Safiullin R.[6]
Sock J.
6-46-3
Masur D.
Moriya H.
4-66-26-1
Karlovskiy E.
Santillan A.
6-46-3
Sugita Y.[1]
Riedi L.
7-666-716-4
Stricker D.
Van Rijthoven T.
5-76-47-67
Sachko V.
Stakhovsky S.
6-36-1
Celikbilek A.
Miedler L.
4-1
R32
Tomic B.
Vukic A.
6-46-3
Celikbilek A.
Donskoy E.[2]
4-66-26-1
Miedler L.
Lacko L.
7-606-4
Grenier H.
Marcora R.[8]
6-47-63
Sachko V.
Polmans M.[4]
2-66-46-2
Stakhovsky S.
Forti F.
6-46-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Gojowczyk P.[3]
6-44-66-4
Karlovskiy E.
Sels J.
6-21-66-1
Riedi L.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-756-46-3
Safiullin R.[6]
Kym J.
6-46-2
Santillan A.
Peniston R.
1-66-16-3
Sugita Y.[1]
Lenz J.
6-27-5
Sock J.
Bellier A.
6-46-3
Masur D.
Marchenko I.[5]
7-617-5
Moriya H.
Bachinger M.
1-66-37-5
Stricker D.
Clarke J.
6-46-4