Vit Kopriva vs Uladzimir Ignatik — Zadar CH Round of 16

Zadar CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Vit Kopriva
CZE
Vit Kopriva
#64ATP
1740ELO
1699Clay ELO
$805kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 March 2021
clay
BLR
Uladzimir Ignatik
#1413ATP
35 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
Kopriva V.
2-6 6-1 6-3
Ignatik U.
Kopriva V.
2662
Ignatik U.
6131

Vit Kopriva defeated Uladzimir Ignatik 2-6 6-1 6-3 in the Zadar CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Vit Kopriva came in ranked #64.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kopriva V.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Ignatik U.

Ignatik U.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Kopriva V.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Kopriva V.Ignatik U.
20
Serve
—
56
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Kopriva V.Ignatik U.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.2
6.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.4
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 32). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kopriva V.Ignatik U.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
72
0
Break points saved·Dominant
83
53
Break points won·Dominant
66
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
90
2
Tiebreaks·Dominant
61
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kopriva V.Ignatik U.
Freshness·
97
—

Kopriva V.: 12 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Milojevic N.[3]
Kuzmanov D.
2-66-27-65
Semi-finals
Milojevic N.[3]
Klein L.
6-44-66-2
Kuzmanov D.
Fatic N.
6-22-0
Quarter-finals
Fatic N.
Nagal S.[2]
5-76-37-5
Kuzmanov D.
Kavcic B.
6-46-1
Milojevic N.[3]
Kopriva V.
7-56-4
Klein L.
Mager G.[1]
6-44-66-4
R16
Nagal S.[2]
Nincevic F.
6-06-1
Fatic N.
Giannessi A.[5]
7-645-77-66
Milojevic N.[3]
Nedelko I.
6-26-1
Klein L.
Vrbensky M.
5-76-36-1
Mager G.[1]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
1-66-46-1
Kavcic B.
Molcan A.
6-26-1
Kuzmanov D.
Kolar Z.
6-46-3
Kopriva V.
Ignatik U.
2-66-16-3
R32
Kuzmanov D.
Moroni G.[8]
6-46-4
Nagal S.[2]
Serdarusic N.
7-646-4
Nincevic F.
Poljicak M.
4-66-46-3
Fatic N.
Bourchier H.
6-26-4
Giannessi A.[5]
Bonadio R.
7-57-5
Molcan A.
Rola B.[4]
6-46-4
Kavcic B.
Pellegrino A.
6-36-1
Kolar Z.
Vatutin A.
6-46-2
Ignatik U.
Horansky F.[6]
6-16-3
Kopriva V.
Bortolotti M.
6-16-3
Nedelko I.
Gabashvili T.
6-22-66-3
Milojevic N.[3]
Wu T.
7-646-1
Vrbensky M.
Couacaud E.[7]
6-36-2
Klein L.
Orlov V.
6-16-2
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Pecotic M.
3-66-36-2
Mager G.[1]
Sijsling I.
6-44-66-4