Nerman Fatic vs Sumit Nagal — Zadar CH Quarter-final

Zadar CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#373ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 March 2021
clay
Sumit Nagal
IND2
Sumit Nagal
#219ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
Fatic N.
5-7 6-3 7-5
Nagal S.
Fatic N.
5672
Nagal S.
7351

Nerman Fatic defeated Sumit Nagal 5-7 6-3 7-5 in the Zadar CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Nagal S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Nagal S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.1
1.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Nagal S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
24
33
Break points saved·Slight edge
63
69
Break points won·Even
36
35
Deciding sets·Slight edge
24
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Fatic N.Nagal S.
Freshness·
—
95

Nagal S.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Milojevic N.[3]
Kuzmanov D.
2-66-27-65
Semi-finals
Milojevic N.[3]
Klein L.
6-44-66-2
Kuzmanov D.
Fatic N.
6-22-0
Quarter-finals
Fatic N.
Nagal S.[2]
5-76-37-5
Kuzmanov D.
Kavcic B.
6-46-1
Milojevic N.[3]
Kopriva V.
7-56-4
Klein L.
Mager G.[1]
6-44-66-4
R16
Nagal S.[2]
Nincevic F.
6-06-1
Fatic N.
Giannessi A.[5]
7-645-77-66
Milojevic N.[3]
Nedelko I.
6-26-1
Klein L.
Vrbensky M.
5-76-36-1
Mager G.[1]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
1-66-46-1
Kavcic B.
Molcan A.
6-26-1
Kuzmanov D.
Kolar Z.
6-46-3
Kopriva V.
Ignatik U.
2-66-16-3
R32
Kuzmanov D.
Moroni G.[8]
6-46-4
Nagal S.[2]
Serdarusic N.
7-646-4
Nincevic F.
Poljicak M.
4-66-46-3
Fatic N.
Bourchier H.
6-26-4
Giannessi A.[5]
Bonadio R.
7-57-5
Molcan A.
Rola B.[4]
6-46-4
Kavcic B.
Pellegrino A.
6-36-1
Kolar Z.
Vatutin A.
6-46-2
Ignatik U.
Horansky F.[6]
6-16-3
Kopriva V.
Bortolotti M.
6-16-3
Nedelko I.
Gabashvili T.
6-22-66-3
Milojevic N.[3]
Wu T.
7-646-1
Vrbensky M.
Couacaud E.[7]
6-36-2
Klein L.
Orlov V.
6-16-2
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Pecotic M.
3-66-36-2
Mager G.[1]
Sijsling I.
6-44-66-4