Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Martin Cuevas — Santiago CH Round of 32

Santiago CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARG
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
#58ATP
1759ELO
1741Clay ELO
$653kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 March 2021
clay
URU
Martin Cuevas
34 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLLW
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-4 6-0
Cuevas M.
Ugo Carabelli C.
662
Cuevas M.
400

Camilo Ugo Carabelli defeated Martin Cuevas 6-4 6-0 in the Santiago CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Cuevas M.

Cuevas M.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Ugo Carabelli C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ugo Carabelli C.Cuevas M.
24
Serve
—
28
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.Cuevas M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
45%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
4.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.4
4.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 46). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ugo Carabelli C.Cuevas M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
78
14
Break points saved·Dominant
90
35
Break points won·Dominant
62
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
96
20
Tiebreaks·Even
72
71

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ugo Carabelli C.Cuevas M.
Freshness·
100
—

Ugo Carabelli C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Baez S.
Barrios Vera T.
6-37-64
Semi-finals
Baez S.
Varillas J.
6-17-63
Barrios Vera T.
Meligeni Alves F.
7-651-1
Quarter-finals
Varillas J.
Jarry N.
6-26-4
Baez S.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-26-1
Meligeni Alves F.
Kicker N.
6-17-5
Barrios Vera T.
Lama G.
7-647-65
R16
Varillas J.
Martin A.[2]
6-46-796-4
Jarry N.
Alvarez N.
6-36-4
Baez S.
Villanueva G.
7-56-2
Ugo Carabelli C.
Altmaier D.[6]
6-43-66-3
Meligeni Alves F.
Sousa P.[3]
6-46-2
Barrios Vera T.
Coppejans K.[7]
6-46-4
Lama G.
Carballes Baena R.[1]
2-67-657-68
Kicker N.
Benchetrit E.
6-26-4
R32
Villanueva G.
Collarini A.
6-46-4
Martin A.[2]
Oliveira G.
7-627-5
Varillas J.
Olivo R.
6-43-67-5
Jarry N.
Tabilo A.[8]
6-36-2
Baez S.
Rune H.
6-26-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Cuevas M.
6-46-0
Altmaier D.[6]
Andreozzi G.
6-46-3
Kicker N.
Kovalik J.[5]
6-26-3
Benchetrit E.
Blancaneaux G.
6-46-4
Sousa P.[3]
Matos R.
6-46-3
Coppejans K.[7]
Luz O.
6-36-1
Lama G.
Etcheverry T.
6-46-2
Carballes Baena R.[1]
Bellucci T.
2-66-27-60
Barrios Vera T.
Lindell C.
4-66-17-64
Alvarez N.
Sakamoto P.
3-66-46-3
Meligeni Alves F.
Menezes J.
5-76-37-5