Viktor Troicki vs Emil Ruusuvuori — Nur-Sultan 2 CH Round of 32

Nur-Sultan 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SRB
Viktor Troicki
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 March 2021
hard
FIN2
Emil Ruusuvuori
#787ATP
1606ELO
1577Hard ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Troicki V.
6-4 6-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Troicki V.
662
Ruusuvuori E.
420

Viktor Troicki defeated Emil Ruusuvuori 6-4 6-2 in the Nur-Sultan 2 CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Emil Ruusuvuori came in leading the head-to-head 3–0. Viktor Troicki claimed a first win over Emil Ruusuvuori in four meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-03-15DubaiQ2hardEmil Ruusuvuori6-2 6-2
2021-02-01Murray River OpenR64hardEmil Ruusuvuori6-3 6-4
2020-10-26Nur-SultanQ2hardEmil Ruusuvuori6-3 6-7(3) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Troicki V.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ruusuvuori E.

Ruusuvuori E.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Troicki V.

Serve advantage — Ruusuvuori E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Troicki V.Ruusuvuori E.
1st serve in·Even
68%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.7
4.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Troicki V.Ruusuvuori E.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
62
72
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
97
Break points won·Clear edge
27
48
Deciding sets·Slight edge
86
80
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
70
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Machac T.
Ofner S.
4-66-46-4
Semi-finals
Ofner S.
Daniel T.[5]
6-36-4
Machac T.
Gunneswaran P.[8]
6-31-66-2
Quarter-finals
Daniel T.[5]
Wu T.
6-26-1
Ofner S.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-624-67-5
Gunneswaran P.[8]
Duckworth J.[4]
6-42-67-61
Machac T.
Kwon S.[1]
6-26-1
R16
Gunneswaran P.[8]
Ito T.
6-32-0
Wu T.
Troicki V.
6-37-68
Daniel T.[5]
Istomin D.
6-26-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Ramanathan R.
6-47-5
Ofner S.
Skatov T.
6-37-64
Duckworth J.[4]
Manafov V.
6-26-757-5
Machac T.
Mcdonald M.
6-46-1
Kwon S.[1]
Polansky P.
7-676-4
R32
Troicki V.
Ruusuvuori E.[2]
6-46-2
Wu T.
Klizan M.
6-34-67-65
Daniel T.[5]
Peniston R.
6-26-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Kukushkin M.[3]
6-37-5
Ramanathan R.
Grenier H.
6-43-66-3
Skatov T.
Popko D.
6-46-4
Ofner S.
Donskoy E.[6]
6-26-4
Ito T.
Yevseyev D.
6-42-66-3
Duckworth J.[4]
Kachmazov A.
6-45-77-5
Machac T.
Laaksonen H.[7]
7-56-2
Kwon S.[1]
Rola B.
7-56-2
Manafov V.
Nedovyesov A.
7-56-3
Gunneswaran P.[8]
Lenz J.
3-66-26-3
Mcdonald M.
Schnur B.
6-34-66-4
Istomin D.
Muller A.
6-33-1
Polansky P.
Blanch U.
7-624-3