Tomas Machac vs Henri Laaksonen — Nur-Sultan 2 CH Round of 32

Nur-Sultan 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 March 2021
hard
SUI7
Henri Laaksonen
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLW
Machac T.
7-5 6-2
Laaksonen H.
Machac T.
762
Laaksonen H.
520

Tomas Machac defeated Henri Laaksonen 7-5 6-2 in the Nur-Sultan 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tomas Machac closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Laaksonen H.

Laaksonen H.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Serve advantage — Machac T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Laaksonen H.
30
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Laaksonen H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Even
5.0
5.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 165). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Laaksonen H.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
84
Break points won·Dominant
80
20
Deciding sets·Even
94
92
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Machac T.
Ofner S.
4-66-46-4
Semi-finals
Ofner S.
Daniel T.[5]
6-36-4
Machac T.
Gunneswaran P.[8]
6-31-66-2
Quarter-finals
Daniel T.[5]
Wu T.
6-26-1
Ofner S.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-624-67-5
Gunneswaran P.[8]
Duckworth J.[4]
6-42-67-61
Machac T.
Kwon S.[1]
6-26-1
R16
Gunneswaran P.[8]
Ito T.
6-32-0
Wu T.
Troicki V.
6-37-68
Daniel T.[5]
Istomin D.
6-26-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Ramanathan R.
6-47-5
Ofner S.
Skatov T.
6-37-64
Duckworth J.[4]
Manafov V.
6-26-757-5
Machac T.
Mcdonald M.
6-46-1
Kwon S.[1]
Polansky P.
7-676-4
R32
Troicki V.
Ruusuvuori E.[2]
6-46-2
Wu T.
Klizan M.
6-34-67-65
Daniel T.[5]
Peniston R.
6-26-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Kukushkin M.[3]
6-37-5
Ramanathan R.
Grenier H.
6-43-66-3
Skatov T.
Popko D.
6-46-4
Ofner S.
Donskoy E.[6]
6-26-4
Ito T.
Yevseyev D.
6-42-66-3
Duckworth J.[4]
Kachmazov A.
6-45-77-5
Machac T.
Laaksonen H.[7]
7-56-2
Kwon S.[1]
Rola B.
7-56-2
Manafov V.
Nedovyesov A.
7-56-3
Gunneswaran P.[8]
Lenz J.
3-66-26-3
Mcdonald M.
Schnur B.
6-34-66-4
Istomin D.
Muller A.
6-33-1
Polansky P.
Blanch U.
7-624-3