Vit Kopriva vs Cem Ilkel — St. Petersburg 1 CH Quarter-final

St. Petersburg 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Vit Kopriva
CZE
Vit Kopriva
#64ATP
1740ELO
1670Hard ELO
$805kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 March 2021
hard
Cem Ilkel
TUR2
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Kopriva V.
7-5 6-2
Ilkel C.
Kopriva V.
762
Ilkel C.
520

Vit Kopriva defeated Cem Ilkel 7-5 6-2 in the St. Petersburg 1 CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Vit Kopriva came in ranked #64, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Vit Kopriva extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Vit Kopriva closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-01-31PuneR32hardVit Kopriva6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Kopriva V.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Ilkel C.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kopriva V.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Kopriva V.Ilkel C.
0
Serve
—
36
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Kopriva V.Ilkel C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.2
4.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 191). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kopriva V.Ilkel C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
72
32
Break points saved·Dominant
83
49
Break points won·Dominant
66
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
90
70
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
61
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kopriva V.Ilkel C.
Freshness·
88
—

Kopriva V.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Bergs Z.
Celikbilek A.
6-43-66-4
Semi-finals
Bergs Z.
Kopriva V.
7-676-2
Celikbilek A.
Dubrivnyy A.
5-76-26-3
Quarter-finals
Kopriva V.
Ilkel C.[2]
7-56-2
Dubrivnyy A.
Kuznetsov A.
6-36-786-3
Celikbilek A.
De Jong J.
7-676-0
Bergs Z.
Catarina L.
6-36-4
R16
Ilkel C.[2]
Stricker D.
6-756-36-3
Kopriva V.
Quiroz R.[7]
6-26-4
Catarina L.
Ebden M.
7-646-2
Bergs Z.
Kotov P.
6-07-5
Kuznetsov A.
Basic M.
6-16-1
Celikbilek A.
Vatutin A.[6]
6-37-63
De Jong J.
Tiurnev E.
6-36-3
Dubrivnyy A.
Durasovic V.
7-53-66-3
R32
Stricker D.
Ajdukovic D.
5-76-46-2
Kopriva V.
Gakhov I.
7-51-67-67
Quiroz R.[7]
Lee D.
6-26-2
Catarina L.
Eubanks C.[4]
7-56-2
Ebden M.
Krstin P.
6-16-4
Kotov P.
Gabashvili T.[5]
6-46-2
Basic M.
Karlovskiy E.[8]
6-06-4
Kuznetsov A.
Pecotic M.
7-606-2
Durasovic V.
Molleker R.[3]
7-626-4
Vatutin A.[6]
Serdarusic N.
6-43-66-0
Celikbilek A.
Sultanov K.
6-46-1
De Jong J.
Ignatik U.
6-44-66-3
Tiurnev E.
Safiullin R.[1]
7-56-4
Dubrivnyy A.
Sijsling I.
3-66-46-3
Bergs Z.
Bourchier H.
6-46-2
Ilkel C.[2]
Sekiguchi S.
6-36-2