Tomas Machac vs Prajnesh Gunneswaran — Nur-Sultan 2 CH Semi-final

Nur-Sultan 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#49ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 March 2021
hard
IND8
Prajnesh Gunneswaran
36 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
Machac T.
6-3 1-6 6-2
Gunneswaran P.
Machac T.
6162
Gunneswaran P.
3621

Tomas Machac defeated Prajnesh Gunneswaran 6-3 1-6 6-2 in the Nur-Sultan 2 CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tomas Machac closed it out in three sets, 6–3 1–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Gunneswaran P.

Gunneswaran P.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Serve advantage — Machac T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Gunneswaran P.
30
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Gunneswaran P.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Even
5.0
5.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 83). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Gunneswaran P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
98
84
Break points won·Dominant
80
14
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
37
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Machac T.
Ofner S.
4-66-46-4
Semi-finals
Ofner S.
Daniel T.[5]
6-36-4
Machac T.
Gunneswaran P.[8]
6-31-66-2
Quarter-finals
Daniel T.[5]
Wu T.
6-26-1
Ofner S.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-624-67-5
Gunneswaran P.[8]
Duckworth J.[4]
6-42-67-61
Machac T.
Kwon S.[1]
6-26-1
R16
Gunneswaran P.[8]
Ito T.
6-32-0
Wu T.
Troicki V.
6-37-68
Daniel T.[5]
Istomin D.
6-26-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Ramanathan R.
6-47-5
Ofner S.
Skatov T.
6-37-64
Duckworth J.[4]
Manafov V.
6-26-757-5
Machac T.
Mcdonald M.
6-46-1
Kwon S.[1]
Polansky P.
7-676-4
R32
Troicki V.
Ruusuvuori E.[2]
6-46-2
Wu T.
Klizan M.
6-34-67-65
Daniel T.[5]
Peniston R.
6-26-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Kukushkin M.[3]
6-37-5
Ramanathan R.
Grenier H.
6-43-66-3
Skatov T.
Popko D.
6-46-4
Ofner S.
Donskoy E.[6]
6-26-4
Ito T.
Yevseyev D.
6-42-66-3
Duckworth J.[4]
Kachmazov A.
6-45-77-5
Machac T.
Laaksonen H.[7]
7-56-2
Kwon S.[1]
Rola B.
7-56-2
Manafov V.
Nedovyesov A.
7-56-3
Gunneswaran P.[8]
Lenz J.
3-66-26-3
Mcdonald M.
Schnur B.
6-34-66-4
Istomin D.
Muller A.
6-33-1
Polansky P.
Blanch U.
7-624-3