Tomas Machac vs Maximilian Marterer — Nur-Sultan 1 CH Round of 16

Nur-Sultan 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#49ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 February 2021
hard
GER
Maximilian Marterer
31 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWW
Machac T.
6-4 3-6 6-3
Marterer M.
Machac T.
6362
Marterer M.
4631

Tomas Machac defeated Maximilian Marterer 6-4 3-6 6-3 in the Nur-Sultan 1 CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tomas Machac closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Marterer M.

Marterer M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Marterer M.
30
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Marterer M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.0
5.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Marterer M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
47
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
93
Break points won·Dominant
80
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
69
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Mcdonald M.
Rodionov J.[6]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Mcdonald M.
Laaksonen H.[5]
6-26-1
Rodionov J.[6]
Gunneswaran P.[4]
6-23-66-3
Quarter-finals
Rodionov J.[6]
Machac T.
6-26-3
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Klizan M.[7]
6-34-66-4
Laaksonen H.[5]
Zuk K.
6-46-3
Mcdonald M.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-43-67-63
R16
Zuk K.
Wu T.
6-34-2
Machac T.
Marterer M.
6-43-66-3
Rodionov J.[6]
Ito T.
6-36-2
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Schnur B.
3-66-36-0
Klizan M.[7]
Blanch U.
6-776-27-65
Laaksonen H.[5]
Gojo B.
1-67-56-2
Ferreira Silva F.
Kotov P.
6-13-66-4
Mcdonald M.
Istomin D.
6-26-3
R32
Zuk K.
Bobrov B.
6-26-1
Machac T.
Donskoy E.[2]
6-33-66-1
Marterer M.
Polansky P.
6-36-4
Schnur B.
Muller A.
7-683-66-1
Blanch U.
Popko D.
6-42-67-67
Klizan M.[7]
Skatov T.
6-44-67-65
Laaksonen H.[5]
Quiroz R.
6-46-2
Gojo B.
Peniston R.
6-31-66-4
Wu T.
Grenier H.
6-47-5
Kotov P.
Rola B.[8]
6-47-67
Ferreira Silva F.
Ofner S.
6-36-4
Istomin D.
Yevseyev D.
6-766-36-3
Mcdonald M.
Kukushkin M.[1]
7-57-5
Ito T.
Manafov V.
6-46-4
Rodionov J.[6]
Nedelko I.
6-36-3
Gunneswaran P.[4]
Tashbulatov D.
6-26-3