Enzo Couacaud vs Nikola Milojevic — Las Palmas 1 CH Semi-final

Las Palmas 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
FRA
Enzo Couacaud
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 February 2021
clay
SRB4
Nikola Milojevic
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Couacaud E.
6-2 6-2
Milojevic N.
Couacaud E.
662
Milojevic N.
220

Enzo Couacaud defeated Nikola Milojevic 6-2 6-2 in the Las Palmas 1 CH semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Nikola Milojevic came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, but Enzo Couacaud had been the form player, winning 2 of their last 6 on clay. Enzo Couacaud claimed a first win over Nikola Milojevic in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-01-17Australian OpenQ3hardNikola Milojevic7-6(6) 7-6(3)

Serve vs return

This season
Couacaud E.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Milojevic N.

Milojevic N.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Couacaud E.

Serve advantage — Couacaud E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Couacaud E.Milojevic N.
1st serve in·Even
56%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
46%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.6
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 142). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Couacaud E.Milojevic N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
47
10
Break points saved·Dominant
79
30
Break points won·Even
29
27
Deciding sets·Dominant
77
11
Tiebreaks·Dominant
29
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Couacaud E.
Diez S.
7-657-63
Semi-finals
Couacaud E.
Milojevic N.[4]
6-26-2
Diez S.
Molcan A.
6-23-67-5
Quarter-finals
Couacaud E.
Trungelliti M.
6-10-67-66
Milojevic N.[4]
Pellegrino A.
4-66-16-4
Diez S.
Bonadio R.
6-36-0
Molcan A.
Horansky F.[8]
6-26-3
R16
Bonadio R.
Kavcic B.
4-66-36-3
Couacaud E.
Robredo T.
6-16-2
Trungelliti M.
Coppejans K.
1-66-36-3
Milojevic N.[4]
Lestienne C.
6-26-4
Pellegrino A.
Ortega Olmedo R.
6-47-5
Horansky F.[8]
Moroni G.
7-636-4
Diez S.
Giannessi A.[7]
7-667-68
Molcan A.
Musetti L.[1]
7-657-64
R32
Coppejans K.
Petrovic D.[5]
6-16-1
Trungelliti M.
Gimeno Valero C.
1-67-676-3
Milojevic N.[4]
Barranco Cosano J.
4-66-46-3
Lestienne C.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-16-4
Pellegrino A.
Garcia Lopez G.
6-46-3
Ortega Olmedo R.
Giustino L.[6]
1-66-36-4
Giannessi A.[7]
Napolitano S.
6-06-2
Diez S.
Nava E.
7-646-746-2
Bonadio R.
Kuhn N.
6-46-4
Kavcic B.
Gaio F.[3]
6-36-3
Horansky F.[8]
Oliveira G.
1-66-46-1
Moroni G.
Guinard M.
6-36-2
Musetti L.[1]
Marti Pujolras A.
6-37-5
Molcan A.
Endler M.
6-06-1
Robredo T.
Serdarusic N.
6-06-4
Couacaud E.
Taberner C.[2]
7-630-62-3