Facundo Bagnis vs Pedro Sakamoto — Cordoba Qualifying Final

Cordoba · ATP · Qualifying Final
ARG1
Facundo Bagnis
#439ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 February 2021
clay
Pedro Sakamoto
BRA
Pedro Sakamoto
#496ATP
1281ELO
1266Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
Bagnis F.
6-2 6-4
Sakamoto P.
Bagnis F.
662
Sakamoto P.
240

Facundo Bagnis defeated Pedro Sakamoto 6-2 6-4 in the Cordoba qualifying final on clay. The result followed the form book — Facundo Bagnis came in ranked #439, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Sakamoto P.

Sakamoto P.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Sakamoto P.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
2.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 173). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Sakamoto P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
13
Break points saved·Dominant
92
48
Break points won·Clear edge
36
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
11
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Bagnis F.Sakamoto P.
Freshness·
—
91

Sakamoto P.: 4 days rest · 1 match, 13 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Q3
Bagnis F.[1]
Sakamoto P.
6-26-4
Cerundolo J.
Menezes J.
6-46-4
Barrios Vera T.
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-637-64
Etcheverry T.
Escobedo E.
7-57-5
Q2
Menezes J.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-16-1
Etcheverry T.
Lindell C.
7-56-2
Barrios Vera T.
Velotti A.
6-36-4
Escobedo E.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-46-1
Ugo Carabelli C.
Diaz Acosta F.
4-66-36-2
Bagnis F.[1]
Collarini A.
7-656-3
Cerundolo J.
Varillas J.[4]
7-676-3
Sakamoto P.
Olivo R.
6-27-5
Q1
Velotti A.
Vilella Martinez M.[8]
6-36-4
Lindell C.
Mena F.
6-10-0
Varillas J.[4]
Franco Descotte M.
6-736-06-0
Sakamoto P.
Gomez E.[5]
3-66-17-65
Etcheverry T.
Mayer L.[2]
7-616-796-3
Escobedo E.
Klein L.
7-644-66-1
Cerundolo J.
Tenti F.
6-06-4
Ugo Carabelli C.
Kestelboim M.
6-06-4
Collarini A.
Casanova H.
6-27-63
Bagnis F.[1]
Tirante T.
6-34-66-4
Barrios Vera T.
Alvarez N.
6-16-2
Gomez Herrera C.
Andreozzi G.[6]
6-37-5
Menezes J.
Justo G.
6-37-64
Olivo R.
Clezar G.
6-46-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Domingues J.[7]
6-26-2
Diaz Acosta F.
Nagal S.[3]
6-42-66-3