Radu Albot vs John Patrick Smith — Singapore Round of 32

Singapore · ATP · Round of 32
Radu Albot
MDA6
Radu Albot
#490ATP
1453ELO
1429Hard ELO
36 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 February 2021
hard
AUS
John Patrick Smith
37 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
Albot R.
6-2 3-6 6-1
Smith J.
Albot R.
6362
Smith J.
2611

Radu Albot defeated John Patrick Smith 6-2 3-6 6-1 in the Singapore round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Radu Albot came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Radu Albot extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Radu Albot closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–1.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-01-03Adelaide 1Q1hardRadu Albot6-7(6) 6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Albot R.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Smith J.

Smith J.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Albot R.

Serve advantage — Albot R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Albot R.Smith J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Albot R.Smith J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
46
16
Break points saved·Even
85
86
Break points won·Clear edge
19
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
76
21
Tiebreaks·Dominant
29
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Albot R.Smith J.
Freshness·
91
—

Albot R.: 8 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Popyrin A.
Bublik A.[4]
4-66-06-2
Semi-finals
Popyrin A.
Cilic M.[3]
7-657-62
Bublik A.[4]
Albot R.[6]
2-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Popyrin A.
Ebden M.
6-47-67
Cilic M.[3]
Kwon S.[8]
6-22-67-5
Bublik A.[4]
Nishioka Y.[5]
6-36-2
Albot R.[6]
Mannarino A.[1]
6-36-4
R16
Ebden M.
Millman J.[2]
6-46-1
Popyrin A.
Andreev A.
6-15-76-3
Cilic M.[3]
Daniel T.
7-56-4
Kwon S.[8]
Uchiyama Y.
6-36-4
Nishioka Y.[5]
Cressy M.
6-46-2
Albot R.[6]
Hanfmann Y.
6-727-676-3
Mannarino A.[1]
Marcora R.
6-37-5
Bublik A.[4]
Celikbilek A.
6-26-2
R32
Popyrin A.
Eubanks C.
7-657-65
Ebden M.
Bhambri Y.
6-37-63
Andreev A.
Harris L.[7]
1-66-36-4
Daniel T.
Ramanathan R.
6-36-736-3
Uchiyama Y.
Polmans M.
6-42-66-4
Kwon S.[8]
Kwiatkowski T.
4-66-36-4
Nishioka Y.[5]
Mmoh M.
6-23-66-3
Cressy M.
Jung J.
7-646-2
Celikbilek A.
Mochizuki S.
6-06-4
Hanfmann Y.
Duckworth J.
6-26-4
Marcora R.
Gulbis E.
7-56-4
Albot R.[6]
Smith J.
6-23-66-1