Sebastian Baez vs Gonzalo Lama — Concepcion CH Round of 32

Concepcion CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Sebastian Baez
ARG
Sebastian Baez
#56ATP
1759ELO
1718Clay ELO
$924kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 14 February 2021
clay
CHI
Gonzalo Lama
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWLL
Baez S.
6-4 6-1
Lama G.
Baez S.
662
Lama G.
410

Sebastian Baez defeated Gonzalo Lama 6-4 6-1 in the Concepcion CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Baez S.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Lama G.

Lama G.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Baez S.

Serve advantage — Baez S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Baez S.Lama G.
7
Serve
—
43
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Baez S.Lama G.
1st serve in·Clear edge
72%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.0
3.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 98). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Baez S.Lama G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
87
35
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
75
Break points won·Dominant
86
0
Deciding sets·Even
88
87
Tiebreaks·Dominant
83
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Baez S.Lama G.
Freshness·
100
—

Baez S.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Baez S.
Cerundolo F.
6-36-757-65
Semi-finals
Baez S.
Martin A.[2]
6-46-3
Cerundolo F.
Tabilo A.
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Martin A.[2]
Altmaier D.[8]
7-646-3
Baez S.
Dellien H.[4]
6-16-1
Cerundolo F.
Seyboth Wild T.[6]
6-37-64
Tabilo A.
Coria F.[1]
7-56-747-62
R16
Martin A.[2]
Sakamoto P.
6-36-3
Altmaier D.[8]
Klein L.
1-66-36-3
Dellien H.[4]
Casanova H.
6-16-3
Baez S.
Galan D.[5]
7-56-2
Seyboth Wild T.[6]
Gomez E.
6-16-2
Cerundolo F.
Jarry N.
4-66-47-5
Tabilo A.
Domingues J.
7-656-2
Coria F.[1]
Barrios Vera T.
6-46-4
R32
Martin A.[2]
Menezes J.
6-36-2
Klein L.
Mena F.
7-56-1
Altmaier D.[8]
Cerundolo J.
4-66-26-1
Dellien H.[4]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-07-67
Casanova H.
Lindell C.
3-67-56-1
Baez S.
Lama G.
6-46-1
Galan D.[5]
Tirante T.
6-36-4
Seyboth Wild T.[6]
Luz O.
6-16-2
Gomez E.
Alvarez N.
6-41-66-0
Cerundolo F.
Collarini A.
7-57-5
Jarry N.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-16-716-2
Tabilo A.
Bagnis F.[7]
6-27-5
Domingues J.
Gomez Herrera C.
4-66-47-5
Barrios Vera T.
Clezar G.
6-26-2
Coria F.[1]
Sachko V.
6-26-2
Sakamoto P.
Andreozzi G.
6-27-63