Aliaksandra Sasnovich vs Lauren Davis — Phillip Island Trophy Round of 64

Phillip Island Trophy · WTA · Round of 64
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
BLR
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
#122WTA
1726ELO
1697Hard ELO
32 yrs · 174 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Saturday, 13 February 2021
hard
USA
Lauren Davis
#1383WTA
32 yrs · 157 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
Sasnovich A.
6-3 6-2
Davis L.
Sasnovich A.
662
Davis L.
320

Aliaksandra Sasnovich defeated Lauren Davis 6-3 6-2 in the Phillip Island Trophy round of 64 on hard. Aliaksandra Sasnovich claimed a first win over Lauren Davis in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-08-29US OpenR128hardLauren Davis6-2 4-6 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Sasnovich A.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Davis L.

Davis L.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Sasnovich A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Sasnovich A.Davis L.
37
Serve
—
35
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Sasnovich A.Davis L.
1st serve in·Even
64%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
46%
Service points won·Even
56%
56%
Return points won·Even
45%
44%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
51%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.8
1.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.3
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 177). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sasnovich A.Davis L.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
61
51
Break points saved·Dominant
79
26
Break points won·Clear edge
93
79
Deciding sets·Clear edge
72
86
Tiebreaks·Dominant
25
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Sasnovich A.Davis L.
Freshness·
100
—

Sasnovich A.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Kasatkina D.
Bouzkova M.[13]
4-66-26-2
Semi-finals
Kasatkina D.
Collins D.[8]
6-26-766-1
Bouzkova M.[13]
Andreescu B.[2]
6-796-27-5
Quarter-finals
Kasatkina D.
Martic P.[4]
6-06-4
Bouzkova M.[13]
Teichmann J.
6-34-66-2
Collins D.[8]
Peterson R.[16]
6-16-2
Andreescu B.[2]
Begu I.
6-34-67-65
R16
Andreescu B.[2]
Diyas Z.
6-1
Teichmann J.
Tig P.
6-33-3
Collins D.[8]
Doi M.
6-46-2
Kasatkina D.
Pavlyuchenkova A.[7]
2-66-16-4
Peterson R.[16]
Gadecki O.
7-56-3
Martic P.[4]
Birrell K.
6-16-3
Bouzkova M.[13]
Da Silva Fick G.
6-16-1
Begu I.
Wang Q.[5]
6-726-26-1
R32
Doi M.
Sorribes Tormo S.
W/O
Da Silva Fick G.
Sasnovich A.
6-32-67-66
Martic P.[4]
Marino R.
6-25-76-4
Gadecki O.
Kenin S.[1]
2-67-646-4
Peterson R.[16]
Minnen G.
7-56-3
Collins D.[8]
Lepchenko V.
6-736-16-3
Pavlyuchenkova A.[7]
Tomljanovic A.
5-76-46-2
Wang Q.[5]
Inglis M.
6-46-2
Diyas Z.
Bogdan A.
6-45-76-2
Birrell K.
Raina A.
6-33-66-4
Bouzkova M.[13]
Zhu L.
6-46-2
Kasatkina D.
Gracheva V.
6-46-3
Tig P.
Jones F.
6-16-4
Begu I.
Blinkova A.
6-36-2
Teichmann J.
Niculescu M.
6-26-2
Andreescu B.[2]
Brengle M.
7-644-66-3
R64
Lepchenko V.
Hibino N.
6-33-0
Bouzkova M.[13]
Kovinic D.
3-65-0
Blinkova A.
Petkovic A.
4-67-636-4
Raina A.
Cocciaretto E.
5-76-16-2
Jones F.
Zheng S.[11]
6-23-66-2
Tomljanovic A.
Cabrera L.
6-36-4
Inglis M.
Rakhimova K.
6-36-3
Begu I.
Podoroska N.[12]
6-36-3
Bogdan A.
Sevastova A.[14]
4-66-36-3
Diyas Z.
Mchale C.
3-66-36-1
Marino R.
Barthel M.
6-46-3
Gadecki O.
Aiava D.
6-46-4
Minnen G.
Babos T.
6-26-2
Peterson R.[16]
Potapova A.
6-44-66-3
Sorribes Tormo S.
Samsonova L.
6-766-17-64
Gracheva V.
Stephens S.[9]
6-26-2
Kasatkina D.
Boulter K.
6-46-2
Teichmann J.
Buzarnescu M.
6-756-36-3
Tig P.
Tsurenko L.
2-66-26-3
Brengle M.
Wang Y.
6-36-4
Zhu L.
Errani S.
6-26-3
Birrell K.
Cornet A.[15]
6-27-5
Sasnovich A.
Davis L.
6-36-2
Doi M.
Garcia C.[10]
7-56-3