Cem Ilkel vs Dimitar Kuzmanov — Potchefstroom 1 CH Quarter-final

Potchefstroom 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Cem Ilkel
TUR6
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 7 February 2021
hard
Dimitar Kuzmanov
BUL
Dimitar Kuzmanov
#394ATP
1431ELO
1425Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWW
Ilkel C.
4-6 6-3 6-2
Kuzmanov D.
Ilkel C.
4662
Kuzmanov D.
6321

Cem Ilkel defeated Dimitar Kuzmanov 4-6 6-3 6-2 in the Potchefstroom 1 CH quarter-final on hard. Cem Ilkel extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-11-06SofiaR32hardCem Ilkel6-0 6-3
2016-03-04Davis Cup G2 R1: BUL vs TURRRhardCem Ilkel7-6(4) 1-6 6-4 1-6 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Ilkel C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Kuzmanov D.

Kuzmanov D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ilkel C.Kuzmanov D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
2.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (191 vs 197). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ilkel C.Kuzmanov D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
17
Break points saved·Clear edge
49
61
Break points won·Dominant
3
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
13
Tiebreaks·Dominant
66
29

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ilkel C.Kuzmanov D.
Freshness·
—
60

Kuzmanov D.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 65 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Bonzi B.[2]
Broady L.
7-56-4
Semi-finals
Bonzi B.[2]
Chappell N.
6-16-2
Broady L.
Ilkel C.[6]
7-636-4
Quarter-finals
Bonzi B.[2]
Basic M.
6-36-1
Broady L.
Tseng C.
6-36-3
Ilkel C.[6]
Kuzmanov D.
4-66-36-2
Chappell N.
Polansky P.[7]
6-46-736-4
R16
Bonzi B.[2]
Quiroz R.
3-66-46-3
Chappell N.
Grenier H.
6-26-4
Polansky P.[7]
Lamasine T.
6-46-4
Broady L.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-47-63
Kuzmanov D.
Benchetrit E.
6-27-5
Ilkel C.[6]
Cagnina J.
6-26-3
Basic M.
Krstin P.
4-1
Tseng C.
Blanch U.
6-726-32-0
R32
Bonzi B.[2]
Blancaneaux G.
6-26-4
Grenier H.
Huesler M.[3]
7-657-5
Tseng C.
Santillan A.
6-14-66-3
Ilkel C.[6]
Brooksby J.
6-36-4
Basic M.
Kolar Z.
7-647-5
Krstin P.
Cid R.[8]
6-37-5
Chappell N.
Kuhn N.
6-12-67-63
Menendez Maceiras A.
Gabashvili T.
6-46-4
Blanch U.
Clarke J.[4]
7-656-4
Kuzmanov D.
Gunneswaran P.[1]
6-36-4
Benchetrit E.
Peniston R.
4-66-46-4
Lamasine T.
Hunter V.
7-611-66-1
Cagnina J.
Montsi K.
6-36-1
Polansky P.[7]
Galovic V.
6-23-67-62
Quiroz R.
Arends R.
6-26-2
Broady L.
Schnur B.[5]
6-46-3