Lukas Rosol vs Hugo Gaston — Cherbourg CH Semi-final

Cherbourg CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
CZE
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 7 February 2021
hard
Hugo Gaston
FRA
Hugo Gaston
#107ATP
1622ELO
1628Hard ELO
$355kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
25 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
Rosol L.
7-5 2-6 6-3
Gaston H.
Rosol L.
7262
Gaston H.
5631

Lukas Rosol defeated Hugo Gaston 7-5 2-6 6-3 in the Cherbourg CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Hugo Gaston came in defending last year's round of 64.

Key context

  • Match story: Lukas Rosol closed it out in three sets, 7–5 2–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rosol L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gaston H.

Gaston H.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rosol L.Gaston H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
2.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (113 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rosol L.Gaston H.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
74
Break points saved·Even
89
91
Break points won·Dominant
3
57
Deciding sets·Even
78
78
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
72
93

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Rosol L.Gaston H.
Freshness·
—
51

Gaston H.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 128 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bemelmans R.
Rosol L.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Rosol L.
Gaston H.
7-52-66-3
Bemelmans R.
Rinderknech A.[3]
6-33-67-5
Quarter-finals
Rinderknech A.[3]
Lestienne C.
7-647-63
Rosol L.
Zuk K.
7-624-67-62
Gaston H.
Klein L.
6-06-3
Bemelmans R.
Geerts M.
4-66-17-64
R16
Rosol L.
Hoang A.[2]
6-35-77-5
Zuk K.
Ofner S.[8]
6-36-2
Klein L.
Rodionov J.[4]
4-66-16-3
Gaston H.
Gojowczyk P.[5]
4-66-36-2
Lestienne C.
Martineau M.
6-36-4
Rinderknech A.[3]
Furness E.
7-656-3
Bemelmans R.
Istomin D.
6-47-64
Geerts M.
Kudla D.[1]
6-16-756-3
R32
Hoang A.[2]
Trungelliti M.
6-16-0
Rosol L.
Molcan A.
1-66-37-66
Ofner S.[8]
Maden Y.
6-16-3
Rodionov J.[4]
De Schepper K.
7-53-66-3
Klein L.
Oliveira G.
6-16-4
Gaston H.
Lenz J.
6-13-66-3
Gojowczyk P.[5]
Wu T.
6-26-4
Martineau M.
Zapata Miralles B.[6]
7-6126-3
Lestienne C.
Droguet T.
1-66-16-2
Rinderknech A.[3]
Vatutin A.
4-66-06-3
Istomin D.
Lammons N.
6-35-76-4
Bemelmans R.
Denolly C.
3-66-16-4
Geerts M.
Forejtek J.
6-726-46-2
Kudla D.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-36-1
Furness E.
Sijsling I.
6-26-4
Zuk K.
Janvier M.
7-641-0