Hugo Gaston vs Lukas Klein — Cherbourg CH Quarter-final

Cherbourg CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Hugo Gaston
FRA
Hugo Gaston
#107ATP
1622ELO
1628Hard ELO
$355kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
25 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 7 February 2021
hard
Lukas Klein
SVK
Lukas Klein
#185ATP
1601ELO
1535Hard ELO
$64kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWLW
Gaston H.
6-0 6-3
Klein L.
Gaston H.
662
Klein L.
030

Hugo Gaston defeated Lukas Klein 6-0 6-3 in the Cherbourg CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Hugo Gaston came in ranked #107, defending last year's round of 64.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gaston H.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Klein L.

Klein L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Gaston H.

Serve advantage — Klein L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gaston H.Klein L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
55%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.9
5.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.2
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gaston H.Klein L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
74
39
Break points saved·Even
91
92
Break points won·Dominant
57
1
Deciding sets·Clear edge
78
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Gaston H.Klein L.
Freshness·
51
—

Gaston H.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 128 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bemelmans R.
Rosol L.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Rosol L.
Gaston H.
7-52-66-3
Bemelmans R.
Rinderknech A.[3]
6-33-67-5
Quarter-finals
Rinderknech A.[3]
Lestienne C.
7-647-63
Rosol L.
Zuk K.
7-624-67-62
Gaston H.
Klein L.
6-06-3
Bemelmans R.
Geerts M.
4-66-17-64
R16
Rosol L.
Hoang A.[2]
6-35-77-5
Zuk K.
Ofner S.[8]
6-36-2
Klein L.
Rodionov J.[4]
4-66-16-3
Gaston H.
Gojowczyk P.[5]
4-66-36-2
Lestienne C.
Martineau M.
6-36-4
Rinderknech A.[3]
Furness E.
7-656-3
Bemelmans R.
Istomin D.
6-47-64
Geerts M.
Kudla D.[1]
6-16-756-3
R32
Hoang A.[2]
Trungelliti M.
6-16-0
Rosol L.
Molcan A.
1-66-37-66
Ofner S.[8]
Maden Y.
6-16-3
Rodionov J.[4]
De Schepper K.
7-53-66-3
Klein L.
Oliveira G.
6-16-4
Gaston H.
Lenz J.
6-13-66-3
Gojowczyk P.[5]
Wu T.
6-26-4
Martineau M.
Zapata Miralles B.[6]
7-6126-3
Lestienne C.
Droguet T.
1-66-16-2
Rinderknech A.[3]
Vatutin A.
4-66-06-3
Istomin D.
Lammons N.
6-35-76-4
Bemelmans R.
Denolly C.
3-66-16-4
Geerts M.
Forejtek J.
6-726-46-2
Kudla D.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-36-1
Furness E.
Sijsling I.
6-26-4
Zuk K.
Janvier M.
7-641-0