Constant Lestienne vs Titouan Droguet — Cherbourg CH Round of 32

Cherbourg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Constant Lestienne
#1261ATP
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 7 February 2021
hard
Titouan Droguet
FRA
Titouan Droguet
#119ATP
1717ELO
1650Hard ELO
$273kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
Lestienne C.
1-6 6-1 6-2
Droguet T.
Lestienne C.
1662
Droguet T.
6121

Constant Lestienne defeated Titouan Droguet 1-6 6-1 6-2 in the Cherbourg CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Titouan Droguet came in ranked #119.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Lestienne C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Droguet T.

Droguet T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Lestienne C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lestienne C.Droguet T.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
65%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.2
6.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lestienne C.Droguet T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
41
64
Break points saved·Even
86
88
Break points won·Clear edge
39
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
26
93
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
70
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Lestienne C.Droguet T.
Freshness·
—
65

Droguet T.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 100 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bemelmans R.
Rosol L.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Rosol L.
Gaston H.
7-52-66-3
Bemelmans R.
Rinderknech A.[3]
6-33-67-5
Quarter-finals
Rinderknech A.[3]
Lestienne C.
7-647-63
Rosol L.
Zuk K.
7-624-67-62
Gaston H.
Klein L.
6-06-3
Bemelmans R.
Geerts M.
4-66-17-64
R16
Rosol L.
Hoang A.[2]
6-35-77-5
Zuk K.
Ofner S.[8]
6-36-2
Klein L.
Rodionov J.[4]
4-66-16-3
Gaston H.
Gojowczyk P.[5]
4-66-36-2
Lestienne C.
Martineau M.
6-36-4
Rinderknech A.[3]
Furness E.
7-656-3
Bemelmans R.
Istomin D.
6-47-64
Geerts M.
Kudla D.[1]
6-16-756-3
R32
Hoang A.[2]
Trungelliti M.
6-16-0
Rosol L.
Molcan A.
1-66-37-66
Ofner S.[8]
Maden Y.
6-16-3
Rodionov J.[4]
De Schepper K.
7-53-66-3
Klein L.
Oliveira G.
6-16-4
Gaston H.
Lenz J.
6-13-66-3
Gojowczyk P.[5]
Wu T.
6-26-4
Martineau M.
Zapata Miralles B.[6]
7-6126-3
Lestienne C.
Droguet T.
1-66-16-2
Rinderknech A.[3]
Vatutin A.
4-66-06-3
Istomin D.
Lammons N.
6-35-76-4
Bemelmans R.
Denolly C.
3-66-16-4
Geerts M.
Forejtek J.
6-726-46-2
Kudla D.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-36-1
Furness E.
Sijsling I.
6-26-4
Zuk K.
Janvier M.
7-641-0