Cem Ilkel vs Julien Cagnina — Potchefstroom 1 CH Round of 16
Potchefstroom 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 7 February 2021
hard
Ilkel C.6-2 6-3
Cagnina J.
Ilkel C.
662
Cagnina J.
230
Cem Ilkel defeated Julien Cagnina 6-2 6-3 in the Potchefstroom 1 CH round of 16 on hard.
Key context
- Match story: Cem Ilkel dropped just 5 games past Julien Cagnina.
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Ilkel C.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
58%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
56%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
66%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.7
4.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.5
4.6
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (191 vs 9). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Quarter-finals
Bonzi B.[2]
Basic M.
6-36-1
Broady L.
Tseng C.
6-36-3
Ilkel C.[6]
Kuzmanov D.
4-66-36-2
Chappell N.
Polansky P.[7]
6-46-736-4
R16
Bonzi B.[2]
Quiroz R.
3-66-46-3
Chappell N.
Grenier H.
6-26-4
Polansky P.[7]
Lamasine T.
6-46-4
Broady L.
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-47-63
Kuzmanov D.
Benchetrit E.
6-27-5
Ilkel C.[6]
Cagnina J.
6-26-3
Basic M.
Krstin P.
4-1
Tseng C.
Blanch U.
6-726-32-0
R32
Bonzi B.[2]
Blancaneaux G.
6-26-4
Grenier H.
Huesler M.[3]
7-657-5
Tseng C.
Santillan A.
6-14-66-3
Ilkel C.[6]
Brooksby J.
6-36-4
Basic M.
Kolar Z.
7-647-5
Krstin P.
Cid R.[8]
6-37-5
Chappell N.
Kuhn N.
6-12-67-63
Menendez Maceiras A.
Gabashvili T.
6-46-4
Blanch U.
Clarke J.[4]
7-656-4
Kuzmanov D.
Gunneswaran P.[1]
6-36-4
Benchetrit E.
Peniston R.
4-66-46-4
Lamasine T.
Hunter V.
7-611-66-1
Cagnina J.
Montsi K.
6-36-1
Polansky P.[7]
Galovic V.
6-23-67-62
Quiroz R.
Arends R.
6-26-2
Broady L.
Schnur B.[5]
6-46-3