Ruben Bemelmans vs Lukas Rosol — Cherbourg CH Final

Cherbourg CH · CHALLENGER · Final
BEL
Ruben Bemelmans
38 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 7 February 2021
hard
CZE
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
Bemelmans R.
6-4 6-4
Rosol L.
Bemelmans R.
662
Rosol L.
440

Ruben Bemelmans defeated Lukas Rosol 6-4 6-4 in the Cherbourg CH final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Lukas Rosol came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Ruben Bemelmans claimed a first win over Lukas Rosol in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Ruben Bemelmans edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2013-10-14ViennaQFhardLukas Rosol6-3 1-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Bemelmans R.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Rosol L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Bemelmans R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bemelmans R.Rosol L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.0
4.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (53 vs 113). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bemelmans R.Rosol L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
16
51
Break points saved·Even
87
89
Break points won·Even
7
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
17
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
9
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Bemelmans R.
Rosol L.
6-46-4
Semi-finals
Rosol L.
Gaston H.
7-52-66-3
Bemelmans R.
Rinderknech A.[3]
6-33-67-5
Quarter-finals
Rinderknech A.[3]
Lestienne C.
7-647-63
Rosol L.
Zuk K.
7-624-67-62
Gaston H.
Klein L.
6-06-3
Bemelmans R.
Geerts M.
4-66-17-64
R16
Rosol L.
Hoang A.[2]
6-35-77-5
Zuk K.
Ofner S.[8]
6-36-2
Klein L.
Rodionov J.[4]
4-66-16-3
Gaston H.
Gojowczyk P.[5]
4-66-36-2
Lestienne C.
Martineau M.
6-36-4
Rinderknech A.[3]
Furness E.
7-656-3
Bemelmans R.
Istomin D.
6-47-64
Geerts M.
Kudla D.[1]
6-16-756-3
R32
Hoang A.[2]
Trungelliti M.
6-16-0
Rosol L.
Molcan A.
1-66-37-66
Ofner S.[8]
Maden Y.
6-16-3
Rodionov J.[4]
De Schepper K.
7-53-66-3
Klein L.
Oliveira G.
6-16-4
Gaston H.
Lenz J.
6-13-66-3
Gojowczyk P.[5]
Wu T.
6-26-4
Martineau M.
Zapata Miralles B.[6]
7-6126-3
Lestienne C.
Droguet T.
1-66-16-2
Rinderknech A.[3]
Vatutin A.
4-66-06-3
Istomin D.
Lammons N.
6-35-76-4
Bemelmans R.
Denolly C.
3-66-16-4
Geerts M.
Forejtek J.
6-726-46-2
Kudla D.[1]
Serdarusic N.
6-36-1
Furness E.
Sijsling I.
6-26-4
Zuk K.
Janvier M.
7-641-0