Jordan Thompson vs Gianluca Mager — Great Ocean Road Open Round of 64

Great Ocean Road Open · ATP · Round of 64
Jordan Thompson
AUS11
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1733Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 February 2021
hard
ITA
Gianluca Mager
#1223ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
Thompson J.
4-6 6-4 6-3
Mager G.
Thompson J.
4662
Mager G.
6431

Jordan Thompson defeated Gianluca Mager 4-6 6-4 6-3 in the Great Ocean Road Open round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Jordan Thompson came in ranked #309, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Jordan Thompson extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-08-30US OpenR128hardJordan Thompson4-6 6-3 7-5 2-6 7-6(3)

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Mager G.

Mager G.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Mager G.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.2
5.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.3
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Mager G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
40
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
86
Break points won·Clear edge
24
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
66
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Sinner J.[4]
Travaglia S.
7-646-4
Semi-finals
Sinner J.[4]
Khachanov K.[2]
7-644-67-64
Travaglia S.
Monteiro T.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Monteiro T.
Thompson J.[11]
6-46-4
Sinner J.[4]
Kecmanovic M.[7]
7-6106-4
Travaglia S.
Hurkacz H.[3]
3-66-37-5
Khachanov K.[2]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-767-56-3
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.
Opelka R.[6]
7-667-64
Khachanov K.[2]
Anderson K.
6-37-65
Kecmanovic M.[7]
Caruso S.
7-655-77-5
Travaglia S.
Bublik A.[8]
6-17-5
Hurkacz H.[3]
Cuevas P.
7-57-5
Thompson J.[11]
Vilella Martinez M.
6-46-4
Monteiro T.
Alcaraz C.
7-636-3
Sinner J.[4]
Bedene A.[13]
7-666-2
R32
Bublik A.[8]
Oconnell C.
7-626-766-4
Khachanov K.[2]
Purcell M.
7-656-3
Vilella Martinez M.
Basilashvili N.[5]
7-56-3
Monteiro T.
Ebden M.
6-746-46-3
Thompson J.[11]
Herbert P.
6-43-66-3
Anderson K.
Stebe C.
6-46-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Majchrzak K.
6-43-66-4
Opelka R.[6]
Stakhovsky S.
7-686-4
Sinner J.[4]
Vukic A.
6-26-4
Bedene A.[13]
Sweeny D.
6-06-4
Kecmanovic M.[7]
Kwon S.
6-36-4
Travaglia S.
Querrey S.[10]
6-776-36-4
Cuevas P.
Haase R.
7-56-3
Alcaraz C.
Goffin D.[1]
6-36-3
Caruso S.
Sandgren T.[9]
6-46-726-1
Hurkacz H.[3]
Torpegaard M.
6-46-3
R64
Bedene A.[13]
Uchiyama Y.
7-657-65
Caruso S.
Seppi A.
7-57-65
Alcaraz C.
Balazs A.
2-2
Vukic A.
Lu Y.
6-47-5
Stebe C.
Dellien H.
6-46-4
Herbert P.
Cressy M.
6-727-627-5
Vilella Martinez M.
Hanfmann Y.
7-626-4
Sweeny D.
Nam J.
7-647-5
Purcell M.
Gombos N.
6-46-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Schoolkate T.
6-47-5
Stakhovsky S.
Safiullin R.
6-756-46-3
Kwon S.
Martin A.
6-36-757-64
Oconnell C.
Koepfer D.
5-76-46-1
Travaglia S.
Carballes Baena R.
2-67-57-62
Querrey S.[10]
Laaksonen H.
4-67-656-0
Monteiro T.
Fancutt T.
6-46-4
Ebden M.
Delbonis F.
6-37-66
Cuevas P.
Andujar P.[14]
6-46-2
Torpegaard M.
Martinez P.
6-47-5
Haase R.
Coppejans K.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[11]
Mager G.
4-66-46-3
Majchrzak K.
Djere L.[12]
6-36-4
Sandgren T.[9]
Smith J.
6-35-76-4
Anderson K.
Lopez F.[16]
6-47-5