Sam Querrey vs Henri Laaksonen — Great Ocean Road Open Round of 64

Great Ocean Road Open · ATP · Round of 64
USA10
Sam Querrey
38 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 February 2021
hard
SUI
Henri Laaksonen
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLW
Querrey S.
4-6 7-6 6-0
Laaksonen H.
Querrey S.
47762
Laaksonen H.
66501

Sam Querrey defeated Henri Laaksonen 4-6 7-6 6-0 in the Great Ocean Road Open round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Sam Querrey came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Sam Querrey extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-02-08MemphisR16hardSam Querrey6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Querrey S.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Laaksonen H.

Laaksonen H.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Querrey S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Querrey S.Laaksonen H.
1st serve in·Even
59%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
80%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
30%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
13.8
5.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (46 vs 165). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Querrey S.Laaksonen H.
Clutch Rating·Even
49
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
84
Break points won·Slight edge
14
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
92
Tiebreaks·Dominant
55
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Sinner J.[4]
Travaglia S.
7-646-4
Semi-finals
Sinner J.[4]
Khachanov K.[2]
7-644-67-64
Travaglia S.
Monteiro T.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Monteiro T.
Thompson J.[11]
6-46-4
Sinner J.[4]
Kecmanovic M.[7]
7-6106-4
Travaglia S.
Hurkacz H.[3]
3-66-37-5
Khachanov K.[2]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-767-56-3
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.
Opelka R.[6]
7-667-64
Khachanov K.[2]
Anderson K.
6-37-65
Kecmanovic M.[7]
Caruso S.
7-655-77-5
Travaglia S.
Bublik A.[8]
6-17-5
Hurkacz H.[3]
Cuevas P.
7-57-5
Thompson J.[11]
Vilella Martinez M.
6-46-4
Monteiro T.
Alcaraz C.
7-636-3
Sinner J.[4]
Bedene A.[13]
7-666-2
R32
Bublik A.[8]
Oconnell C.
7-626-766-4
Khachanov K.[2]
Purcell M.
7-656-3
Vilella Martinez M.
Basilashvili N.[5]
7-56-3
Monteiro T.
Ebden M.
6-746-46-3
Thompson J.[11]
Herbert P.
6-43-66-3
Anderson K.
Stebe C.
6-46-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Majchrzak K.
6-43-66-4
Opelka R.[6]
Stakhovsky S.
7-686-4
Sinner J.[4]
Vukic A.
6-26-4
Bedene A.[13]
Sweeny D.
6-06-4
Kecmanovic M.[7]
Kwon S.
6-36-4
Travaglia S.
Querrey S.[10]
6-776-36-4
Cuevas P.
Haase R.
7-56-3
Alcaraz C.
Goffin D.[1]
6-36-3
Caruso S.
Sandgren T.[9]
6-46-726-1
Hurkacz H.[3]
Torpegaard M.
6-46-3
R64
Bedene A.[13]
Uchiyama Y.
7-657-65
Caruso S.
Seppi A.
7-57-65
Alcaraz C.
Balazs A.
2-2
Vukic A.
Lu Y.
6-47-5
Stebe C.
Dellien H.
6-46-4
Herbert P.
Cressy M.
6-727-627-5
Vilella Martinez M.
Hanfmann Y.
7-626-4
Sweeny D.
Nam J.
7-647-5
Purcell M.
Gombos N.
6-46-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Schoolkate T.
6-47-5
Stakhovsky S.
Safiullin R.
6-756-46-3
Kwon S.
Martin A.
6-36-757-64
Oconnell C.
Koepfer D.
5-76-46-1
Travaglia S.
Carballes Baena R.
2-67-57-62
Querrey S.[10]
Laaksonen H.
4-67-656-0
Monteiro T.
Fancutt T.
6-46-4
Ebden M.
Delbonis F.
6-37-66
Cuevas P.
Andujar P.[14]
6-46-2
Torpegaard M.
Martinez P.
6-47-5
Haase R.
Coppejans K.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[11]
Mager G.
4-66-46-3
Majchrzak K.
Djere L.[12]
6-36-4
Sandgren T.[9]
Smith J.
6-35-76-4
Anderson K.
Lopez F.[16]
6-47-5