Cedrik Marcel Stebe vs Hugo Dellien — Great Ocean Road Open Round of 64

Great Ocean Road Open · ATP · Round of 64
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
GER
Cedrik Marcel Stebe
#366ATP
1556ELO
1523Hard ELO
35 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 February 2021
hard
Hugo Dellien
BOL
Hugo Dellien
#144ATP
1637ELO
1486Hard ELO
$217kYTD
$3.1MCAREER
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLLLLL
Stebe C.
6-4 6-4
Dellien H.
Stebe C.
662
Dellien H.
440

Cedrik Marcel Stebe defeated Hugo Dellien 6-4 6-4 in the Great Ocean Road Open round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Hugo Dellien came in ranked #144.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Stebe C.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Dellien H.

Dellien H.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Stebe C.

Serve advantage — Dellien H.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stebe C.Dellien H.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
71%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
51%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.2
1.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (125 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stebe C.Dellien H.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
51
61
Break points saved·Clear edge
75
89
Break points won·Clear edge
10
32
Deciding sets·Slight edge
86
91
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
68
47

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Stebe C.Dellien H.
Freshness·
—
51

Dellien H.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 126 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Sinner J.[4]
Travaglia S.
7-646-4
Semi-finals
Sinner J.[4]
Khachanov K.[2]
7-644-67-64
Travaglia S.
Monteiro T.
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Monteiro T.
Thompson J.[11]
6-46-4
Sinner J.[4]
Kecmanovic M.[7]
7-6106-4
Travaglia S.
Hurkacz H.[3]
3-66-37-5
Khachanov K.[2]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-767-56-3
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.
Opelka R.[6]
7-667-64
Khachanov K.[2]
Anderson K.
6-37-65
Kecmanovic M.[7]
Caruso S.
7-655-77-5
Travaglia S.
Bublik A.[8]
6-17-5
Hurkacz H.[3]
Cuevas P.
7-57-5
Thompson J.[11]
Vilella Martinez M.
6-46-4
Monteiro T.
Alcaraz C.
7-636-3
Sinner J.[4]
Bedene A.[13]
7-666-2
R32
Bublik A.[8]
Oconnell C.
7-626-766-4
Khachanov K.[2]
Purcell M.
7-656-3
Vilella Martinez M.
Basilashvili N.[5]
7-56-3
Monteiro T.
Ebden M.
6-746-46-3
Thompson J.[11]
Herbert P.
6-43-66-3
Anderson K.
Stebe C.
6-46-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Majchrzak K.
6-43-66-4
Opelka R.[6]
Stakhovsky S.
7-686-4
Sinner J.[4]
Vukic A.
6-26-4
Bedene A.[13]
Sweeny D.
6-06-4
Kecmanovic M.[7]
Kwon S.
6-36-4
Travaglia S.
Querrey S.[10]
6-776-36-4
Cuevas P.
Haase R.
7-56-3
Alcaraz C.
Goffin D.[1]
6-36-3
Caruso S.
Sandgren T.[9]
6-46-726-1
Hurkacz H.[3]
Torpegaard M.
6-46-3
R64
Bedene A.[13]
Uchiyama Y.
7-657-65
Caruso S.
Seppi A.
7-57-65
Alcaraz C.
Balazs A.
2-2
Vukic A.
Lu Y.
6-47-5
Stebe C.
Dellien H.
6-46-4
Herbert P.
Cressy M.
6-727-627-5
Vilella Martinez M.
Hanfmann Y.
7-626-4
Sweeny D.
Nam J.
7-647-5
Purcell M.
Gombos N.
6-46-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Schoolkate T.
6-47-5
Stakhovsky S.
Safiullin R.
6-756-46-3
Kwon S.
Martin A.
6-36-757-64
Oconnell C.
Koepfer D.
5-76-46-1
Travaglia S.
Carballes Baena R.
2-67-57-62
Querrey S.[10]
Laaksonen H.
4-67-656-0
Monteiro T.
Fancutt T.
6-46-4
Ebden M.
Delbonis F.
6-37-66
Cuevas P.
Andujar P.[14]
6-46-2
Torpegaard M.
Martinez P.
6-47-5
Haase R.
Coppejans K.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[11]
Mager G.
4-66-46-3
Majchrzak K.
Djere L.[12]
6-36-4
Sandgren T.[9]
Smith J.
6-35-76-4
Anderson K.
Lopez F.[16]
6-47-5