Peter Gojowczyk vs Arthur RinderknechQuimper 2 CH Round of 16

Quimper 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
36 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 31 January 2021
hard
#28ATP
1780ELO
1748Hard ELO
$855kYTD
$7.2MCAREER
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWLWW
Gojowczyk P.
7-5 6-7 6-3
Rinderknech A.
Gojowczyk P.
76262
Rinderknech A.
57731

Peter Gojowczyk defeated Arthur Rinderknech 7-5 6-7 6-3 in the Quimper 2 CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Peter Gojowczyk closed it out in three sets, 7–5 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gojowczyk P.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Rinderknech A.

Rinderknech A.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Gojowczyk P.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Gojowczyk P.Rinderknech A.
Serve
51
Return
1

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Clear edge
52%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
10.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.0
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (146 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Even
61
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
99
Break points won·Dominant
35
6
Deciding sets·Clear edge
75
91
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
76
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·
91

Rinderknech A.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast