Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Lorenzo Giustino — Antalya 2 CH Round of 32

Antalya 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Thiago Seyboth Wild
BRA4
Thiago Seyboth Wild
#284ATP
1532ELO
1516Clay ELO
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 31 January 2021
clay
Lorenzo Giustino
ITA
Lorenzo Giustino
#196ATP
1420ELO
1355Clay ELO
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWWWL
Seyboth Wild T.
6-4 6-3
Giustino L.
Seyboth Wild T.
662
Giustino L.
430

Thiago Seyboth Wild defeated Lorenzo Giustino 6-4 6-3 in the Antalya 2 CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Seyboth Wild T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Giustino L.

Giustino L.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Seyboth Wild T.

Serve advantage — Seyboth Wild T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Seyboth Wild T.Giustino L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
3.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Seyboth Wild T.Giustino L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
27
2
Break points saved·Dominant
93
41
Break points won·Clear edge
25
12
Deciding sets·Slight edge
20
12
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
16
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Seyboth Wild T.Giustino L.
Freshness·Dominant
88
45

Seyboth Wild T.: 6 days rest · 2 matches, 37 games (7d) · Giustino L.: 1 day rest · 5 matches, 120 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Taberner C.
Munar J.[2]
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Taberner C.
Etcheverry T.
7-56-2
Munar J.[2]
Giannessi A.
6-02-0
Quarter-finals
Taberner C.
Bagnis F.[6]
6-37-60
Munar J.[2]
Kovalik J.[5]
7-56-736-1
Giannessi A.
Tabilo A.
5-77-56-1
Etcheverry T.
Mayer L.
6-36-4
R16
Munar J.[2]
Ramanathan R.
6-47-5
Kovalik J.[5]
Griekspoor T.
6-16-2
Tabilo A.
Galan D.[3]
2-66-46-4
Giannessi A.
Safwat M.
6-36-4
Mayer L.
Santillan A.
7-646-2
Etcheverry T.
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
6-23-66-4
Taberner C.
Gomez E.
6-06-756-1
Bagnis F.[6]
Popko D.
6-16-2
R32
Santillan A.
Lorenzi P.
5-76-46-2
Munar J.[2]
Kirkin E.
6-36-3
Griekspoor T.
Escobedo E.
6-36-2
Kovalik J.[5]
Ilkel C.
6-36-1
Tabilo A.
Agabigun S.
7-666-1
Safwat M.
Domingues J.
6-16-4
Giannessi A.
Altmaier D.[8]
7-626-2
Mayer L.
Musetti L.[7]
6-46-3
Etcheverry T.
Menezes J.
2-66-16-2
Seyboth Wild T.[4]
Giustino L.
6-46-3
Popko D.
Mena F.
7-646-3
Taberner C.
Sousa J.[1]
6-16-4
Galan D.[3]
Robredo T.
6-25-76-0
Gomez E.
Ajdukovic D.
3-66-26-4
Bagnis F.[6]
Ilhan M.
6-36-4
Ramanathan R.
Moroni G.
4-66-47-66