Denis Istomin vs Lukas Lacko — Quimper 1 CH Round of 32

Quimper 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
UZB
Denis Istomin
39 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 24 January 2021
hard
SVK
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Istomin D.
6-3 6-7 7-6
Lacko L.
Istomin D.
662772
Lacko L.
377641

Denis Istomin defeated Lukas Lacko 6-3 6-7 7-6 in the Quimper 1 CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Denis Istomin came in leading the head-to-head 3–2. Denis Istomin extended the head-to-head to 4–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Denis Istomin closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–7 7–6.

Head to head

3–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-07-21AtlantaR16hardLukas Lacko5-7 6-1 6-4
2013-07-22AtlantaR32hardDenis Istomin6-1 6-3
2010-08-22New HavenR16hardDenis Istomin6-2 2-6 6-3
2010-02-01ZagrebR32hardLukas Lacko6-2 2-2 RET
2008-01-14Australian OpenR128hardDenis Istomin6-3 6-7(1) 7-6(4) 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Istomin D.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Lacko L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Istomin D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Istomin D.Lacko L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
34%
Break points saved·Even
57%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.4
5.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (86 vs 60). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Istomin D.Lacko L.
Clutch Rating·Even
29
26
Break points saved·Even
90
86
Break points won·Even
5
8
Deciding sets·Slight edge
44
33
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
18
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Korda S.[2]
Horansky F.
6-16-1
Semi-finals
Horansky F.
Nakashima B.
7-6104-66-4
Korda S.[2]
Bonzi B.
7-657-61
Quarter-finals
Bonzi B.
Marchenko I.
6-776-46-4
Korda S.[2]
Couacaud E.
4-1
Nakashima B.
Lestienne C.
6-47-5
Horansky F.
Zuk K.
6-37-5
R16
Horansky F.
Marterer M.
6-767-56-4
Marchenko I.
Barrere G.[3]
6-36-2
Korda S.[2]
Bourgue M.
5-77-626-4
Couacaud E.
Furness E.
6-46-756-3
Bonzi B.
Maden Y.
4-66-27-65
Nakashima B.
Gaio F.[5]
6-26-1
Lestienne C.
Istomin D.
6-46-4
Zuk K.
Rinderknech A.
7-676-2
R32
Korda S.[2]
Lamasine T.
7-634-67-67
Bourgue M.
Rosol L.
7-656-4
Furness E.
Marcora R.
6-26-1
Couacaud E.
Rodionov J.[6]
6-31-66-4
Barrere G.[3]
Gaston H.
6-36-4
Marchenko I.
Cazaux A.
6-47-5
Bonzi B.
Huesler M.[8]
6-36-727-65
Gaio F.[5]
Gulbis E.
6-47-63
Istomin D.
Lacko L.
6-36-727-64
Zuk K.
Gojowczyk P.[7]
6-46-3
Horansky F.
Pouille L.[1]
6-45-76-4
Nakashima B.
Janvier M.
6-36-2
Lestienne C.
Kudla D.[4]
6-27-66
Maden Y.
Fabbiano T.
6-15-76-1
Rinderknech A.
Cornut Chauvinc A.
7-57-64
Marterer M.
Ofner S.
5-76-47-66