Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Lorenzo Musetti — Doha Aus Open Qualies Qualifying Round 1

Doha Aus Open Qualies · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 10 January 2021
hard
Lorenzo Musetti
ITA13
Lorenzo Musetti
#14ATP
1869ELO
1804Hard ELO
$961kYTD
$15MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLWWL
Van De Zandschulp B.
3-6 6-1 6-4
Musetti L.
Van De Zandschulp B.
3662
Musetti L.
6141

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Lorenzo Musetti 3-6 6-1 6-4 in the Doha Aus Open Qualies qualifying round 1 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Lorenzo Musetti came in ranked #14.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Musetti L.

Musetti L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Van De Zandschulp B.Musetti L.
41
Serve
54
43
Return
62

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.Musetti L.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
4.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van De Zandschulp B.Musetti L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
77
89
Break points saved·Even
98
98
Break points won·Clear edge
68
82
Deciding sets·Clear edge
79
99
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
81
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Van De Zandschulp B.Musetti L.
Freshness·
91
—

Van De Zandschulp B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Draw — qualifying

Q3
Machac T.
Torpegaard M.
6-26-1
Mmoh M.
Rinderknech A.
6-37-63
Karatsev A.[3]
Muller A.
6-26-1
Laaksonen H.[15]
Gojo B.
6-746-47-67
Alcaraz C.[21]
Dellien H.[2]
6-26-3
Coppejans K.
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-26-0
Halys Q.
Haase R.
6-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Bourgue M.
7-646-4
Vilella Martinez M.
Wu T.
4-67-56-4
Stakhovsky S.
Sweeny D.
2-66-36-1
Ymer E.
Daniel T.[5]
6-16-2
Safiullin R.
Lestienne C.
6-726-36-4
Cressy M.
Brown D.
7-656-4
Tomic B.
Smith J.
6-45-77-67
Ferreira Silva F.
Barrere G.[1]
6-36-4
Troicki V.
Stebe C.[11]
6-46-2
Q2
Machac T.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-17-64
Barrere G.[1]
Janvier M.
6-24-66-1
Dellien H.[2]
Harris A.
6-47-66
Van De Zandschulp B.
Menezes J.
6-36-716-4
Ymer E.
Huesler M.[27]
1-66-36-2
Alcaraz C.[21]
Karlovskiy E.
7-617-64
Laaksonen H.[15]
Diez S.
3-66-46-2
Dzumhur D.[7]
Lenz J.
6-26-2
Lestienne C.
Gunneswaran P.[12]
6-26-3
Cressy M.
Maden Y.
2-66-36-4
Brown D.
Taberner C.[22]
6-37-5
Daniel T.[5]
Marterer M.
6-36-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Milojevic N.[18]
2-66-16-4
Halys Q.
Ilkel C.
2-67-626-1
Coppejans K.
Safwat M.[31]
6-36-4
Smith J.
Griekspoor T.
2-66-36-4
Stakhovsky S.
Kubler J.
7-646-4
Rinderknech A.
Hoang A.[8]
7-626-4
Bourgue M.
Rola B.[32]
6-26-746-3
Vilella Martinez M.
Cerundolo F.[19]
W/O
Muller A.
Polansky P.
6-06-1
Tomic B.
Schoolkate T.
6-41-67-63
Stebe C.[11]
Hijikata R.
6-46-2
Troicki V.
Blanch U.
7-56-3
Haase R.
Moroni G.
6-47-5
Sweeny D.
Kudla D.[4]
W/O
Mmoh M.
Li Z.
2-66-47-67
Torpegaard M.
Zhang Z.
6-14-66-1
Safiullin R.
Krueger M.
6-16-4
Gojo B.
Giustino L.[29]
6-37-67
Karatsev A.[3]
Purcell M.
6-16-2
Wu T.
Ramanathan R.
6-36-2
Q1
Menezes J.
Collarini A.
1-67-686-3
Vilella Martinez M.
Giannessi A.
6-16-3
Karlovskiy E.
Mena F.
3-66-36-2
Maden Y.
Ito T.
6-46-2
Griekspoor T.
Bourchier H.
7-666-3
Alcaraz C.[21]
Horansky F.
5-76-16-4
Harris A.
Bemelmans R.
6-45-76-3
Smith J.
Lorenzi P.[25]
7-56-1
Gunneswaran P.[12]
Schnur B.
6-44-66-2
Ymer E.
Mott B.
6-46-3
Stakhovsky S.
Zapata Miralles B.[28]
7-646-4
Krueger M.
Couacaud E.
3-66-26-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Musetti L.[13]
3-66-16-4
Torpegaard M.
Moraing M.
6-16-0
Mmoh M.
Petrovic D.[24]
6-36-2
Polansky P.
Molleker R.
6-787-56-3
Kudla D.[4]
Benchetrit E.
6-46-3
Halys Q.
Bonzi B.
6-06-2
Dzumhur D.[7]
Gomez E.
5-76-36-2
Li Z.
Kwiatkowski T.
4-66-36-4
Stebe C.[11]
Fabbiano T.
6-14-67-63
Moroni G.
Zverev M.
4-66-36-0
Rola B.[32]
Gulbis E.
7-626-3
Ilkel C.
Gojowczyk P.[26]
6-26-3
Hoang A.[8]
Robredo T.
6-17-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Lacko L.
6-36-2
Safwat M.[31]
De Greef A.
6-26-4
Janvier M.
Rosol L.
6-787-56-1
Milojevic N.[18]
Viola M.
6-46-4
Muller A.
Gaio F.[17]
6-16-1
Laaksonen H.[15]
Kamke T.
7-56-3
Brown D.
Moriya H.
6-22-66-1
Daniel T.[5]
Cid R.
4-66-26-1
Rinderknech A.
Masur D.
7-636-3
Lenz J.
Olivo R.
1-66-26-2
Kubler J.
Ebden M.
7-52-66-4
Ramanathan R.
Bagnis F.[10]
7-667-5
Dellien H.[2]
Tabilo A.
6-16-0
Blanch U.
Kuznetsov A.
6-46-1
Bourgue M.
Escobedo E.
7-656-2
Cerundolo F.[19]
Garcia Lopez G.
6-26-4
Haase R.
Seyboth Wild T.[6]
3-66-47-68
Machac T.
Domingues J.
6-36-1
Sweeny D.
Copil M.
7-632-66-3
Karatsev A.[3]
Nakashima B.
6-26-746-2
Schoolkate T.
Andreozzi G.
7-616-4
Zhang Z.
Donskoy E.[9]
7-56-3
Tomic B.
Kovalik J.[14]
6-43-66-4
Taberner C.[22]
Marcora R.
6-27-5
Barrere G.[1]
Kolar Z.
7-656-3
Diez S.
Vatutin A.
6-34-66-4
Hijikata R.
Eubanks C.
6-26-3
Cressy M.
Soeda G.[16]
6-736-47-5
Giustino L.[29]
Istomin D.
6-16-1
Lestienne C.
Broady L.
7-616-2
Troicki V.
Rodionov J.[23]
2-66-26-1
Gojo B.
Ofner S.
6-36-2
Safiullin R.
Otte O.[20]
7-666-4
Huesler M.[27]
Santillan A.
6-33-66-3
Purcell M.
Gaston H.
7-634-66-3
Marterer M.
Trungelliti M.
4-66-46-4
Wu T.
Clarke J.
6-26-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Klizan M.[30]
6-16-4
Coppejans K.
Marchenko I.
7-626-3