Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Joao MenezesDoha Aus Open Qualies Qualifying Round 2

Doha Aus Open Qualies · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
#55ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 10 January 2021
hard
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLWW
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-3 6-7 6-4
Menezes J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
66162
Menezes J.
37741

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Joao Menezes 6-3 6-7 6-4 in the Doha Aus Open Qualies qualifying round 2 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Menezes J.

Menezes J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Van De Zandschulp B.Menezes J.
41
Serve
43
Return

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
52%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
3.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 59). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
77
12
Break points saved·Dominant
98
43
Break points won·Dominant
68
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
14
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
81
63

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·
91

Van De Zandschulp B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Draw — qualifying

Q1
Menezes J.
Collarini A.
1-67-686-3
Vilella Martinez M.
Giannessi A.
6-16-3
Karlovskiy E.
Mena F.
3-66-36-2
Maden Y.
Ito T.
6-46-2
Griekspoor T.
Bourchier H.
7-666-3
Alcaraz C.[21]
Horansky F.
5-76-16-4
Harris A.
Bemelmans R.
6-45-76-3
Smith J.
Lorenzi P.[25]
7-56-1
Gunneswaran P.[12]
Schnur B.
6-44-66-2
Ymer E.
Mott B.
6-46-3
Stakhovsky S.
Zapata Miralles B.[28]
7-646-4
Krueger M.
Couacaud E.
3-66-26-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Musetti L.[13]
3-66-16-4
Torpegaard M.
Moraing M.
6-16-0
Mmoh M.
Petrovic D.[24]
6-36-2
Polansky P.
Molleker R.
6-787-56-3
Kudla D.[4]
Benchetrit E.
6-46-3
Halys Q.
Bonzi B.
6-06-2
Dzumhur D.[7]
Gomez E.
5-76-36-2
Li Z.
Kwiatkowski T.
4-66-36-4
Stebe C.[11]
Fabbiano T.
6-14-67-63
Moroni G.
Zverev M.
4-66-36-0
Rola B.[32]
Gulbis E.
7-626-3
Ilkel C.
Gojowczyk P.[26]
6-26-3
Hoang A.[8]
Robredo T.
6-17-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Lacko L.
6-36-2
Safwat M.[31]
De Greef A.
6-26-4
Janvier M.
Rosol L.
6-787-56-1
Milojevic N.[18]
Viola M.
6-46-4
Muller A.
Gaio F.[17]
6-16-1
Laaksonen H.[15]
Kamke T.
7-56-3
Brown D.
Moriya H.
6-22-66-1
Daniel T.[5]
Cid R.
4-66-26-1
Rinderknech A.
Masur D.
7-636-3
Lenz J.
Olivo R.
1-66-26-2
Kubler J.
Ebden M.
7-52-66-4
Ramanathan R.
Bagnis F.[10]
7-667-5
Dellien H.[2]
Tabilo A.
6-16-0
Blanch U.
Kuznetsov A.
6-46-1
Bourgue M.
Escobedo E.
7-656-2
Cerundolo F.[19]
Garcia Lopez G.
6-26-4
Haase R.
Seyboth Wild T.[6]
3-66-47-68
Machac T.
Domingues J.
6-36-1
Sweeny D.
Copil M.
7-632-66-3
Karatsev A.[3]
Nakashima B.
6-26-746-2
Schoolkate T.
Andreozzi G.
7-616-4
Zhang Z.
Donskoy E.[9]
7-56-3
Tomic B.
Kovalik J.[14]
6-43-66-4
Taberner C.[22]
Marcora R.
6-27-5
Barrere G.[1]
Kolar Z.
7-656-3
Diez S.
Vatutin A.
6-34-66-4
Hijikata R.
Eubanks C.
6-26-3
Cressy M.
Soeda G.[16]
6-736-47-5
Giustino L.[29]
Istomin D.
6-16-1
Lestienne C.
Broady L.
7-616-2
Troicki V.
Rodionov J.[23]
2-66-26-1
Gojo B.
Ofner S.
6-36-2
Safiullin R.
Otte O.[20]
7-666-4
Huesler M.[27]
Santillan A.
6-33-66-3
Purcell M.
Gaston H.
7-634-66-3
Marterer M.
Trungelliti M.
4-66-46-4
Wu T.
Clarke J.
6-26-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Klizan M.[30]
6-16-4
Coppejans K.
Marchenko I.
7-626-3