Quentin Halys vs Benjamin Bonzi — Doha Aus Open Qualies Qualifying Round 1

Doha Aus Open Qualies · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
Quentin Halys
FRA
Quentin Halys
#90ATP
1707ELO
1677Hard ELO
$694kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 10 January 2021
hard
Benjamin Bonzi
FRA
Benjamin Bonzi
#102ATP
1749ELO
1713Hard ELO
$396kYTD
$4.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWWWL
Halys Q.
6-0 6-2
Bonzi B.
Halys Q.
662
Bonzi B.
020

Quentin Halys defeated Benjamin Bonzi 6-0 6-2 in the Doha Aus Open Qualies qualifying round 1 on hard. The result followed the form book — Quentin Halys came in ranked #90. Quentin Halys extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-01-12AdelaideQ1hardQuentin Halys6-3 6-4
2025-06-16HalleR32grassQuentin Halys6-4 6-4
2024-11-04MetzQFhardBenjamin Bonzi6-3 7-6(1)
2023-08-28US OpenR128hardBenjamin Bonzi5-7 6-4 6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Halys Q.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Bonzi B.

Bonzi B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Halys Q.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Halys Q.Bonzi B.
39
Serve
27
26
Return
32

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Halys Q.Bonzi B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
79%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
67%
64%
Return points won·Even
34%
37%
Break points saved·Even
65%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
11.1
5.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Halys Q.Bonzi B.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
57
65
Break points saved·Even
97
96
Break points won·Clear edge
4
27
Deciding sets·Even
75
77
Tiebreaks·Even
91
90

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Halys Q.Bonzi B.
Freshness·Even
93
96

Halys Q.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Bonzi B.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Draw — qualifying

Q3
Machac T.
Torpegaard M.
6-26-1
Mmoh M.
Rinderknech A.
6-37-63
Karatsev A.[3]
Muller A.
6-26-1
Laaksonen H.[15]
Gojo B.
6-746-47-67
Alcaraz C.[21]
Dellien H.[2]
6-26-3
Coppejans K.
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-26-0
Halys Q.
Haase R.
6-36-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Bourgue M.
7-646-4
Vilella Martinez M.
Wu T.
4-67-56-4
Stakhovsky S.
Sweeny D.
2-66-36-1
Ymer E.
Daniel T.[5]
6-16-2
Safiullin R.
Lestienne C.
6-726-36-4
Cressy M.
Brown D.
7-656-4
Tomic B.
Smith J.
6-45-77-67
Ferreira Silva F.
Barrere G.[1]
6-36-4
Troicki V.
Stebe C.[11]
6-46-2
Q2
Machac T.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-17-64
Barrere G.[1]
Janvier M.
6-24-66-1
Dellien H.[2]
Harris A.
6-47-66
Van De Zandschulp B.
Menezes J.
6-36-716-4
Ymer E.
Huesler M.[27]
1-66-36-2
Alcaraz C.[21]
Karlovskiy E.
7-617-64
Laaksonen H.[15]
Diez S.
3-66-46-2
Dzumhur D.[7]
Lenz J.
6-26-2
Lestienne C.
Gunneswaran P.[12]
6-26-3
Cressy M.
Maden Y.
2-66-36-4
Brown D.
Taberner C.[22]
6-37-5
Daniel T.[5]
Marterer M.
6-36-4
Ferreira Silva F.
Milojevic N.[18]
2-66-16-4
Halys Q.
Ilkel C.
2-67-626-1
Coppejans K.
Safwat M.[31]
6-36-4
Smith J.
Griekspoor T.
2-66-36-4
Stakhovsky S.
Kubler J.
7-646-4
Rinderknech A.
Hoang A.[8]
7-626-4
Bourgue M.
Rola B.[32]
6-26-746-3
Vilella Martinez M.
Cerundolo F.[19]
W/O
Muller A.
Polansky P.
6-06-1
Tomic B.
Schoolkate T.
6-41-67-63
Stebe C.[11]
Hijikata R.
6-46-2
Troicki V.
Blanch U.
7-56-3
Haase R.
Moroni G.
6-47-5
Sweeny D.
Kudla D.[4]
W/O
Mmoh M.
Li Z.
2-66-47-67
Torpegaard M.
Zhang Z.
6-14-66-1
Safiullin R.
Krueger M.
6-16-4
Gojo B.
Giustino L.[29]
6-37-67
Karatsev A.[3]
Purcell M.
6-16-2
Wu T.
Ramanathan R.
6-36-2
Q1
Menezes J.
Collarini A.
1-67-686-3
Vilella Martinez M.
Giannessi A.
6-16-3
Karlovskiy E.
Mena F.
3-66-36-2
Maden Y.
Ito T.
6-46-2
Griekspoor T.
Bourchier H.
7-666-3
Alcaraz C.[21]
Horansky F.
5-76-16-4
Harris A.
Bemelmans R.
6-45-76-3
Smith J.
Lorenzi P.[25]
7-56-1
Gunneswaran P.[12]
Schnur B.
6-44-66-2
Ymer E.
Mott B.
6-46-3
Stakhovsky S.
Zapata Miralles B.[28]
7-646-4
Krueger M.
Couacaud E.
3-66-26-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Musetti L.[13]
3-66-16-4
Torpegaard M.
Moraing M.
6-16-0
Mmoh M.
Petrovic D.[24]
6-36-2
Polansky P.
Molleker R.
6-787-56-3
Kudla D.[4]
Benchetrit E.
6-46-3
Halys Q.
Bonzi B.
6-06-2
Dzumhur D.[7]
Gomez E.
5-76-36-2
Li Z.
Kwiatkowski T.
4-66-36-4
Stebe C.[11]
Fabbiano T.
6-14-67-63
Moroni G.
Zverev M.
4-66-36-0
Rola B.[32]
Gulbis E.
7-626-3
Ilkel C.
Gojowczyk P.[26]
6-26-3
Hoang A.[8]
Robredo T.
6-17-5
Ferreira Silva F.
Lacko L.
6-36-2
Safwat M.[31]
De Greef A.
6-26-4
Janvier M.
Rosol L.
6-787-56-1
Milojevic N.[18]
Viola M.
6-46-4
Muller A.
Gaio F.[17]
6-16-1
Laaksonen H.[15]
Kamke T.
7-56-3
Brown D.
Moriya H.
6-22-66-1
Daniel T.[5]
Cid R.
4-66-26-1
Rinderknech A.
Masur D.
7-636-3
Lenz J.
Olivo R.
1-66-26-2
Kubler J.
Ebden M.
7-52-66-4
Ramanathan R.
Bagnis F.[10]
7-667-5
Dellien H.[2]
Tabilo A.
6-16-0
Blanch U.
Kuznetsov A.
6-46-1
Bourgue M.
Escobedo E.
7-656-2
Cerundolo F.[19]
Garcia Lopez G.
6-26-4
Haase R.
Seyboth Wild T.[6]
3-66-47-68
Machac T.
Domingues J.
6-36-1
Sweeny D.
Copil M.
7-632-66-3
Karatsev A.[3]
Nakashima B.
6-26-746-2
Schoolkate T.
Andreozzi G.
7-616-4
Zhang Z.
Donskoy E.[9]
7-56-3
Tomic B.
Kovalik J.[14]
6-43-66-4
Taberner C.[22]
Marcora R.
6-27-5
Barrere G.[1]
Kolar Z.
7-656-3
Diez S.
Vatutin A.
6-34-66-4
Hijikata R.
Eubanks C.
6-26-3
Cressy M.
Soeda G.[16]
6-736-47-5
Giustino L.[29]
Istomin D.
6-16-1
Lestienne C.
Broady L.
7-616-2
Troicki V.
Rodionov J.[23]
2-66-26-1
Gojo B.
Ofner S.
6-36-2
Safiullin R.
Otte O.[20]
7-666-4
Huesler M.[27]
Santillan A.
6-33-66-3
Purcell M.
Gaston H.
7-634-66-3
Marterer M.
Trungelliti M.
4-66-46-4
Wu T.
Clarke J.
6-26-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Klizan M.[30]
6-16-4
Coppejans K.
Marchenko I.
7-626-3